I strongly disagree with the following sentence from the above synopsis of 'Siddhartha': <br><br>Then a life of pleasure and titillation merely eroded away his spiritual gains until he was just like all the other "child people," dragged around by his desires.<br><br>Siddhartha intentionally & mindfully immersed himself in the world/samsara. It wasn't some mindless, orgiastic surrender to worldly pleasures. His relationship with Kamala, as he says, taught him things he never would have learned as a Samana or as a monk. This experimentation & experiencing phase of his life shouldn't be dismissed lightly. It taught him how to connect more deeply with what he saw as the life experience of other humans, whereas before he had felt cut off from such an understanding. And in the end, he did leave it, and he left with newer kinds & levels of understanding. I think it shows a gross misunderstanding to say that this phase of his life "merely eroded away his spiritual gains". I don't see how anyone who has read the book and really appreciated Siddhartha's journey could make such a simplistic, one-sided statement.


Reply With Quote