The Literature Network

Go Back   Literature Network Forums > Reading > Philosophical Literature

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 11-20-2009, 12:17 PM   #16
neilgee
Registered User
 
neilgee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 126
I ploughed through a large [500+ page] biography of Satre only last year. One of the things that decided me to read it was the thought that at least I'd understand what existentialism was by the end of it, but I was thwarted as both Satre and Camus denied the label and refused to have anything to do with any existentialist movement in their lives.

I found all this denial abit confusing, but at least thanks to DanielBenoit's post I now understand how we define a work as existential
__________________
All's well that ends well
neilgee is offline   Reply With Quote
Word from our Sponsor:

Old 11-20-2009, 12:39 PM   #17
DanielBenoit
Signifying nothing. . . .
 
DanielBenoit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Green Bay
Posts: 2,066
Blog Entries: 63
Send a message via MSN to DanielBenoit
Quote:
Originally Posted by neilgee View Post
I ploughed through a large [500+ page] biography of Satre only last year. One of the things that decided me to read it was the thought that at least I'd understand what existentialism was by the end of it, but I was thwarted as both Satre and Camus denied the label and refused to have anything to do with any existentialist movement in their lives.

I found all this denial abit confusing, but at least thanks to DanielBenoit's post I now understand how we define a work as existential
Thanks

The fallout between Camus and Satre was pointless and was purely personal. Now of course there are some major and minor differences in their philosophy, but existentialism is not an ideology, it is a collection of thoughts which all have a common theme. Some of them arrive at opposing conclusions, but they are still considered existential. To clear things up for everyone, here are what is considered to be the most important existential philosophers and writers:

Forerunner:
Blaise Pascal

Key Figures:
Soren Kierkegaard
Friedrich Nietzsche
Fydor Dostoyevsky
Franz Kafka
Martin Heidigger
Martin Buber
Lev Shestov
Jean-Paul Satre
Karl Jaspers
Albert Camus
Simone de Beauvoir
Samuel Beckett
Eugene Ionesco
__________________
Estragon: Nothing to be done.
Vladimir: I'm beginning to come round to that opinion.

Hamm: What's happening, what's happening?
Clov: Something is taking its course.

my blog: danielbenoit.blog.com
DanielBenoit is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Universality and Literature JBI General Literature 30 12-06-2008 02:52 PM
We Need A Revolution In Literature! WolfLarsen General Writing 48 09-24-2008 08:18 AM
Literature is my cup of tea blazeofglory General Writing 3 09-10-2008 10:51 AM
Your national vs. world literature aabbcc General Literature 8 02-06-2008 08:12 PM
What has literature in store for you? hbacharya General Literature 1 04-21-2007 07:03 PM


Enter your email address to subscribe to the forum newsletter:


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:40 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2006, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Site Copyright © 2000-2004 Jalic LLC. All rights reserved.