"to reason" (for and) "against reading"...

		Literature Network Forums > Discussion on Specific Authors & Books > Author List: > Shakespeare, William > Love's Labour's Lost
"to reason" (for and) "against reading"...

Notices

Welcome to the Literature Network Forums forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us or post in the registration help forum for unregistered users.

Thread Tools

Rate Thread

03-03-2007, 12:37 PM	#1
A MM Registered User Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 20	"to reason" (for and) "against reading"... I've just begun re-reading L.L.L. Also begun feeling my way around here. Have some comments which maybe I can get some responses for. To begin with, should the spelling remain "labour" and not be chnaged to "labor" in a new reading? The "our" spelling will not match the way the word is spelt in the newspaper.

Word from our Sponsor:

Bookmarks

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Forum Rules

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:40 PM.