Nah, you could even be right.
I'm looking at it through 2008 eyes, where the entire society is desensitised to violence by the constant stream of horrific crime and war stories in electronic media.
In Oceania, those stories don't exist and aside from the executions, I don't think people would see much in the way of actual violence - there wouldn't be any in society. In some parts of the world, nearly everyone owns a gun, in Oceania, nobody owns one.
You could be quite right that executions were designed to be the desensitising agent, but it seems somewhat counter-productive to doublethink. I can't quite tie in why desensitising people to violence would benefit the Party.



Reply With Quote