Guilty By Association. How Everyone Within Society Partakes In Human Suffering.

[Mr Hyde]

You make way too many generalizations for someone who doesn't have any friends.

We all make generalizations. You've made plenty in this thread and others.

Generalizations are apart of our frail human nature.

'The People'? What people? The people you talk to on the internet? Or the people you watch on tv? Or the people who you watch from your window? Without any real relationships, you can't tell me what people are like. You don't know any people.

Are you saying I can't learn anything from observing others or by reading the history of our species which acts in a consistent manner and pattern?

I know lots of people who are dedicated to improving the lives of others

And yet I'm sure they partake in the services of those who live very inequal lives.

If you shop at a grocery store you are partaking in the services of someone paid a minimal wage and if that person is secretly miserable inside your interaction with them for their labors of bringing you service is a transaction of inequalness is it not?

and no; their motive is not selfish.

No?

If you can't comprehend genuine compassion, well, it's something that can't be explained.

And what is genuine compassion? Why can it not be explained or measured?

This little theory of yours is entirely one dimensional.

And all of humanity is one dimensional.

You act as if your words are considered concrete fact and unquestionable, therefore it is really difficult to argue with you.

I'm just opinionated. That's all. You could argue your point with me and I would listen although I probally wouldn't agree.

And yeah, I did read your post. You don't need to point out how mine contradicts yours, I did that on purpose (but thanks for telling me the theme of your post, it was so subtly stated and your concepts are so wise and intelligent that I couldn't have comprehended without your condescension).

Thanks for the compliment.

Maybe if you change 'The People' to 'The Majority' I would agree with you. The way you're stating it is as if everyone is exactly the same (without an socio-cultural or socio-economic standards).

Everyone consumes and consumption is built upon inequalness.

You don't know everybody. From what I read on your blog, you don't even know ANYBODY!

So please don't enlighten us, the less intelligent than yourself, on how people work and function. Your supreme intellect might just blow our minds.

Temper.........Temper.

No need to get angry at a simple conversation.

[Sweets America]

You make way too many generalizations for someone who doesn't have any friends. 'The People'? What people? The people you talk to on the internet? Or the people you watch on tv? Or the people who you watch from your window? Without any real relationships, you can't tell me what people are like. You don't know any people.

You keep referring to these 'People' who you've never clearly defined. I know lots of people who are dedicated to improving the lives of others and no; their motive is not selfish. If you can't comprehend genuine compassion, well, it's something that can't be explained.

This little theory of yours is entirely one dimensional. You act as if your words are considered concrete fact and unquestionable, therefore it is really difficult to argue with you. And yeah, I did read your post. You don't need to point out how mine contradicts yours, I did that on purpose (but thanks for telling me the theme of your post, it was so subtly stated and your concepts are so wise and intelligent that I couldn't have comprehended without your condescension).

Maybe if you change 'The People' to 'The Majority' I would agree with you. The way you're stating it is as if everyone is exactly the same (without an socio-cultural or socio-economic standards). You don't know everybody. From what I read on your blog, you don't even know ANYBODY! So please don't enlighten us, the less intelligent than yourself, on how people work and function. Your supreme intellect might just blow our minds.

I can't believe how mean you are. That really saddens me. Why do you need to attack people because they are lonely? Don't talk to us about compassion because coming from you, that's a big joke. I only saw cruelty in your post.

[Mr. Vandemar]

I didn't attack him because was lonely. I got defensive because of his subtle indications that I am only stating the obvious and that I am stupid.