Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 29

Thread: 1984? They wish

  1. #1
    Darren
    Guest

    1984? They wish

    Contrary to what everyone else keeps saying, I don't believe 1984 is happening now, or could ever happen, in the real world. Granted, hundreds of little aspects and details of 1984 have happened, are happening, and will happen in the real world, but a 95% transparency of the real world to 1984's world isn't good enough. That's no more relevant than saying 1984 is happening because gin exists in 1984 and gin exists in the real world. The Party's power has to be perfect for it to be what it is, it has to be 100%. Nothing is ever perfect in the real world, and that's why 1984 has never happened, isn't happening, and will never happen. The one enduring, eternal truth of humanity is that humanity has never, ever managed to live up to its own ideals or goals whether they be loving or hateful good or evil, as it quickly falls prey to incompetence, miscommunication, and outright hypocrisy and self-destructiveness. We're flawed. Flawedness means you can neither be perfectly good (utopia) nor perfectly evil (dystopia). Any system we create from now to the end of time will be flawed, for we are flawed. If we create computers to compensate for our flaws, they will be flawed because we created them. Today's world, like the world before it and the world to come after it, is rife with crime, hypocrisy, incompetence, idiocy at the highest levels of government and at the highest levels of the scientific and religious elite. All our spy technology which is supposedly going to create some sort of future utopia or dystopia (neither will happen, nor can ever happen) is infected with countless computer viruses, bugs of all descriptions, and subversive counter-spy programs. The wider the bandwidth of spy/data technology, the more spam and disinformation will be generated to fill it and render it no more useful than a pair of binoculars.<br><br>Computer programming is an excellent example of pristine mind control. A computer is a totally receptive controlled mind which you directly insert thoughts into without any concern for actual logic, for a computer's logic can be adjusted in extremely fine increments to suit any specific situation, similar to a perfect application of doublethink. Theoretically, this gives you infinite control over the universe. If you just build enough computers to do your bidding, you can become God, or, conversely you can program the computers to tell you you're God (the 1984 style). Either way, you could achieve eternal power. Or not... The problem is that nothing ever really works. It works for a little while, then it breaks down due to inevitable forces of chaos and entropy. No human has ever lived forever, for the same reason, nor any life form of any species. Our universe won't last forever, nor our sun, nor our life-supporting climate. Evolution on our planet exists for that very reason, the requirement is constant biological change to adapt to a constantly changing unpredictable universe. The essence of 1984, of the Party, of Big Brother, is not just plain vanilla power, it's Perfect Power. Only Perfect Power can be sustained for eternity and not require evolution. But nothing is perfect therefore there can be no utterly perfect power. The individual is obviously imperfect, the book acknowledges that. But the Party is also not perfect, collectivism is imperfect, consciousness, even and especially doublethink consciousness is imperfect, and oligarchy is imperfect. In fact, Control itself is so imperfect it has never lasted for any appreciable length of time throughout history. This truth doesn't however stop some of our current world leaders from trying to act like despots and maniacs for they are truly masters of idiotic doublethink. So we can say 1984 is happening now. And in the future, people reading the book will be able to say it's happening then, and if the book were somehow beamed into the past before it was written, people would also find it familiar then as well. There will always be some overconfident jerk trying to create 1984, he'll always fail because it's permanently impossible.<br><br>What this book really is is a satirical look at what's happening in the world now, has happened in it, and will happen, but as a satire it's meant to serve as an example of what a civilization looks like before it comes crashing down with a noisy avalanche of bricks. There's always an external enemy to test the mettle of any civilization and quickly rock that society's foundations if it's not efficient enough (ie. based upon objective reality which is shared with the enemy), and even if some sort of permanent stalemate were formed with other world powers, there would still be the forces of nature, tornadoes, earthquakes, ice ages, global warming, tsunamis, etc. and the forces of outer space, extraterrestrials, solar flares, supernovae, comets, and asteroids. Who cares if Eastasia and Eurasia can't destroy Oceania? Look beyond the Earth. Space aliens or natural or stellar disasters could destroy the Earth just as readily. 1984 is based on the concept of perfect containment. In a perfect bubble of thought-defined dimensionally and temporally stable zero entropy existence, it's true 1984 could exist. The only place such a bubble can exist is imagination, and that's the only place 1984 can exist.<br><br>In a way, 1984 has always existed and will always exist because there will always be people trying to make it happen because they see it as "progress", and in a way it has, isn't and never will exist. One thing's for sure, that whatever you believe or think about it, doublethink or not, doesn't make the slightest difference to objective reality...If you would like evidence of this, jump over a cliff and refuse to believe that gravity is affecting you....Mind over matter? I think not. Absolutely not.<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br>

  2. #2
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    1
    This concept is quite difficult to understand. I am a fourteen-year-old, so i do no not doubt that you will understand the concept. Think outside the square you live in.

    Let us say that every concept in the universe, on earth-everywhere was made from Human ideas. We, being human no doubt can make mistakes. Our perceptions of reality might not be true. Our perceptions are being forced to all become one. Using propaganda this is happening. Ideas can change. Perceptions can be changed.

    Imagine if you thought computers were an unecessary to have. A month later you started your own websites, and thought that not having a computer would be insane. That would be a change of mind or perception of a point of view; likewise other concepts can be changed.

    Two plus two can equal four, if needed. ANything you want can be 100%. When O'Brien says says he can wish to float in a bubble, he can. This human perception that we have made, is something that we think is real. It can be mind over matter if you make it into this concept. Trying to understand think this in the beginning is exetremely difficult. I hope you get it.

  3. #3
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    18

    RE: 1984 They Wish

    This is in response to the lengthy rant expressing annoyance with people's comparison of the 1984 world to our own.

    I mean, I think he's justified in arguing that the world has, to some degree, resembled elements of the Orwellian world in both the past and present. But, I take exception with the last paragraph of the rant, especially, that stated the following:

    "whatever you believe or think about it, doublethink or not, doesn't make the slightest difference to objective reality...If you would like evidence of this, jump over a cliff and refuse to believe that gravity is affecting you....Mind over matter? I think not. Absolutely not."

    Perhaps he didn't dwell long enough on the message in the book that illustrates the breaking of the human spirit by torture and breaking someone down, psychologically. It seems the book was trying to illustrate that its possible for a human to be broken in spirit so that their own perspective and "objective reality" becomes altered, or modified.

    That was what made the party and Big Brother so powerful. If someone was too clever to be deceived by newspeak, or to smart to deceive themselves with doublethink, the party would torture you; not until you confessed to believe, but until you were so thoroughly broken mentally and emotionally, that you didn't know up from down, anymore. They would twist your mind with false logic, while tormenting you, until you weren't sure of your perspective. Does anyone really know how they would behave or reason if subjected to terrible torments, while brilliant, artful interrogators reasoned with you in doublespeak?

    The other part of the rant I'd like to comment on was regarding the following:

    "There will always be some overconfident jerk trying to create 1984, he'll always fail because it's permanently impossible.<br><br>What this book really is is a satirical look at what's happening in the world now, has happened in it, and will happen, but as a satire it's meant to serve as an example of what a civilization looks like before it comes crashing down with a noisy avalanche of bricks. There's always an external enemy to test the mettle of any civilization and quickly rock that society's foundations if it's not efficient enough (ie. based upon objective reality which is shared with the enemy), and even if some sort of permanent stalemate were formed with other world powers, there would still be the forces of nature, tornadoes, earthquakes, ice ages, global warming, tsunamis, etc. and the forces of outer space, extraterrestrials, solar flares, supernovae, comets, and asteroids. Who cares if Eastasia and Eurasia can't destroy Oceania? Look beyond the Earth. Space aliens or natural or stellar disasters could destroy the Earth just as readily. 1984 is based on the concept of perfect containment. In a perfect bubble of thought-defined dimensionally and temporally stable zero entropy existence, it's true 1984 could exist. The only place such a bubble can exist is imagination, and that's the only place 1984 can exist.<br><br>In a way, 1984 has always existed and will always exist because there will always be people trying to make it happen because they see it as "progress", and in a way it has, isn't and never will exist."


    Again, I agree that there will, in the future as in the past, be some elite group mirroring the "1984" world. But, it really doesn't matter if the 'whole' world doesn't become a total Utopia or Dystopia. You don't need the whole world to be Orwellian to make a large group of fellow humans, miserable. In the book, Big Brother didn't have his thumb on the whole world, just a certain number of people inside the boundaries of its control. The book made the point that if you are the one suffering under tyranny, that's what matters.

    All it takes is one or a few truly bad people, with other dupes and opportunists and you can have a horrible society. Like the book said, when you're being tortured, at your breaking point, you don't care, anymore. You just want it to stop. You want it to happen to anyone, but you. Or, like the Devil said in the Bible: "Skin in behalf of skin, and everything a man has he will give in behalf of his soul."

  4. #4
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    2
    I can't honestly say I read either of those really long posts in full, but i get the jist of them. I both agree and disagree with saying that we are in that Orwellian world. Orwell's 1984 was merely his prediction of where our society was headed, and truthfully, we are headed there. Think about tv and the news. If you were watching the news and it announced that we were now at war with japan, you'd probably believe it, wouldnt you? Even it it were not true, we wouldn't know any better. That is exactly how it was in 1984. The party, by limiting what people knew, basically controlled their minds. When they said we were at war with Eurasia, people believed it. Now think about this. If everyone in the world truly believed that 2 and 2 make 5, how could you possible argue otherwise?

  5. #5
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by Darren
    One thing's for sure, that whatever you believe or think about it, doublethink or not, doesn't make the slightest difference to objective reality...If you would like evidence of this, jump over a cliff and refuse to believe that gravity is affecting you....Mind over matter? I think not. Absolutely not.
    Is it really for sure though? If you jump off the cliff and die, the only people who know you have died are the people watching/who find out. If the Party said you had not died and people believed it, you would not have died - all records would say you were alive, why certain people might even say they saw you walking around. Dead men tell no tales, none that the Party would be unable to alter anyway.

    I agree that such a world is impossible under the EXACT circumstances of 1984, but the same sort of method of control can arise easily. Instead of Big Brother ruling us, we are ruled by corporations. Everything is commercialised, everyone is told to behave in some sort of way and people who do not fit into the norm are excluded. Perhaps not '1984' style, but we are definitely sinking into a 'Fahrenheit 411' sort of world. I'd suggest reading that if you haven't yet. Just look at society these days, that's how people are.

  6. #6
    Another part of you
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    134
    Jesus Christ, it's symbolism people!!! Symbolism!!! The government IS using the means of mass communications to control the way that we think of the world and thus, easily gaining our avid support of their lousy actions. We're happy though. And if we express any alternative attitude, we're 'unpatriotic' or 'UnAmerican' or something. This is literature.

    If you read Orwell and say "this isn't happening in our world today because in the book I see this, this, and this, and in reality those things are not there"
    then you've totally missed most of the point of Orwell's masterpiece. I suggest that you study Biology or Mathematics instead.

  7. #7
    Another part of you
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    134
    Allow me to clarify. When I say "people" what I really mean is Darren.

  8. #8
    Reader Green Lady's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    In my mind... Oh wait, you meant place?
    Posts
    88
    I see 1984 as sort of an exaggeration of the negatives of our world in the past, present, and future. What happened in the book may not happen exactily like that in real life, but you have to admit that the world today has some destinct characteristics that mirror 1984, albeit a slightly warped mirror. It's just like any farce, minus the humor. It exaggerates characteristics to show a theme, give a lesson.

  9. #9
    Registered User Teacher's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    92
    Rock Rocks you Rock my socks. You are correct. Most impressive coming from a 14-year old. Hopefully Darren will have read your response carefully.

  10. #10
    Registered User Teacher's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    92

    Thumbs down

    Darren are you ....... you need to rethink your decicion...!!!!!

  11. #11
    thinker? jessezzel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    San Deigo, CA
    Posts
    36
    Quote Originally Posted by ThatIndividual
    Jesus Christ, it's symbolism people!!! Symbolism!!! The government IS using the means of mass communications to control the way that we think of the world and thus, easily gaining our avid support of their lousy actions. We're happy though. And if we express any alternative attitude, we're 'unpatriotic' or 'UnAmerican' or something. This is literature.

    If you read Orwell and say "this isn't happening in our world today because in the book I see this, this, and this, and in reality those things are not there"
    then you've totally missed most of the point of Orwell's masterpiece. I suggest that you study Biology or Mathematics instead.
    I totally agree with this because the point of the novel is to show a concept threw the EXTREME of it. He isnt saying this is what 1984 is really going to be like. He is simply trying to show things that the government uses (like listening in on conversations) in the extreme of it so that people will understand it and understand how wrong it is, and to present ideas about how humanity in the whole Ministry of Love bit. Because that is a whole Clockwork Orange scene, and it is just showing that people can be molded, manipulated, and broken if the right things are done to them.
    So to keep this short (unlike some) the novel is simply there to present ideas and to make you think about them. It is not a prophecy.
    "It is not a novel to be thrown aside lightly. It should be thrown aside with great force." - Dorothy Parker

  12. #12
    Quote Originally Posted by jessezzel
    I totally agree with this because the point of the novel is to show a concept threw the EXTREME of it. He isnt saying this is what 1984 is really going to be like. He is simply trying to show things that the government uses (like listening in on conversations) in the extreme of it so that people will understand it and understand how wrong it is, and to present ideas about how humanity in the whole Ministry of Love bit. Because that is a whole Clockwork Orange scene, and it is just showing that people can be molded, manipulated, and broken if the right things are done to them.
    So to keep this short (unlike some) the novel is simply there to present ideas and to make you think about them. It is not a prophecy.
    True, while not prophecy, it is an extream thought as to what may come, with extream being the key here.

  13. #13
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    7
    O.k. You might find that 1984 isn't relevant, but compare the theories of constant war and class struggles to the world and they do make sense. Such ideas as doublethink obviously exist doublethink can be as simple as being fourteen and believing that you will stay with your boyfriend/girlfriend and get married to them and saying that it is different to the last time you said it with your ex boyfriend/girlfriend when all logic points to the fact that its not true. I know the book doesnt refer to the use of doublethink like that but that just shows how simple doublethink can be.
    Do you not see a link between the elite ruling and the proletariat being ruled, lets face it american presidents have to be rich to have a chance of being elected, i might be wrong those are just my thoughts on the book and its relevance to the modern day world.

  14. #14
    I'd like to make a comment about the first post- specifically, mind over matter.

    I agree with many of the above posts concerning this matter- If you truly beleive that you are unaffected by gravity- then you won't actually notice that you are quite suddenly dead. Think about the mentally insane, or the movie "A Beautiful Mind." A person's mind may tell them one thing, when 'reality' is something completely different.

    If Winston was broken down far enough to truly beleive that 2+2=5, then no one would be able to convince him otherwise, despite what we know to be 'true.'

  15. #15
    Miss Smilla
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Australia, but now i'm living in England! Excited!
    Posts
    23
    Whilst i completely agree with the perspective that 1984 is highly satirical, i would like to point out to the certain individuals that claim that 1984 cannot and is not happening that, had they read more about Maos government in China they would maybe change their minds.
    Suggested reading:
    'Life and death in Shanghai' by Nien Cheng
    'Wild Swans' by Jung Chang
    In the undergrowth
    There lives a Bloath
    Who feeds upon poets and tea.
    Luckily, I know this about him
    While he knows almost nothing of me!

    - Shel Silverstein

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. thoughts on 1984
    By Sean in forum 1984
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-13-2008, 03:57 PM
  2. 1984 or 2002??
    By Pablo in forum 1984
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-06-2005, 07:49 PM
  3. 1984 / We
    By Jim in forum 1984
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 05-24-2005, 06:07 PM
  4. 1984 vs. 2003
    By Unregistered in forum 1984
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 05-24-2005, 06:07 PM
  5. 1984 and the defense of socialism
    By earth in forum 1984
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-25-2004, 09:45 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •