Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 21

Thread: Art criticism

  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    153

    Post Art criticism

    Art Criticism

    In this painting, the artist has made a very strong statement about the human condition .

    The canvas is pregnant with possibilities. The infinite and the void seem to merge.

    The artist has captured the trembling moment of creation when something bursts out of the void.

    There is a strong element of subjectivity where the superposition of possibilities is quantum mechanically destroyed by the observer .

    In this painting, the artist has captured the human predicament characterized by post-modernist angst and fractured human consciousness and space-time.

    In summary, the artist has tapped into an elemental force of energy where everything emerges out of nothingness and nothing emerges out of everything (!).


    Footnote :

    The painting contains a small dot in the middle of an otherwise empty canvas !!

  2. #2
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    153
    This is an attempt at a very, very light satire of an art criticism almost bordering on an attempt at being a criticism itself but this is just a hypothetical parody and is not aimed at anyone in particular. Of course, i consider myself a follower of writing in general and not of art but i think art criticism has its own literary merits aside from its importance in artistic circles.

    Looking back at this piece, i feel that the critic attempts to see the real significance of a piece of art which may not have been obvious to the artists themselves and hence may even see value in a piece that has been discarded by the artistic circle.

    This , i think is less true of writing, since writing is a far more self conscious activity and though one can keep drawing out meanings, it is more difficult to see meaning in a piece unless the poet / writer has intended to imbue it with meaning

  3. #3
    Artist and Bibliophile stlukesguild's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    The USA... or thereabouts
    Posts
    6,083
    Blog Entries
    78
    The artist is the creator of beautiful things. To reveal art and conceal the artist is art's aim. The critic is he who can translate into another manner or a new material his impression of beautiful things.
    The highest as the lowest form of criticism is a mode of autobiography...

    All art is at once surface and symbol. Those who go beneath the surface do so at their peril. Those who read the symbol do so at their peril. It is the spectator, and not life, that art really mirrors.


    Oscar Wilde
    Beware of the man with just one book. -Ovid
    The man who doesn't read good books has no advantage over the man who can't read them.- Mark Twain
    My Blog: Of Delicious Recoil
    http://stlukesguild.tumblr.com/

  4. #4
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    153
    I should add, no piece can really be without complete meaning and hence the value and significance of "criticism" is reinforced.

  5. #5
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    6,053
    Surprisingly observers often discover deeper meanings or interpret far more from pieces of art (and indeed writing) than was ever intended by the creator. That's not to undervalue the intelligence of the creator or suggest the critic is being over-pretentious. I guess it shows that art is a two-way street - the astute observer playing as important a role as the original creator.

    I thought your tongue-in-cheek parody was spot on by the way.

    H

  6. #6
    Philosophaster Climacus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    180
    Quote Originally Posted by Oscar Wilde
    The artist is the creator of beautiful things . . .
    This seems right to me, for all its simplicity. It rightly stresses the poietic nature of art too.

    To reveal art and conceal the artist is art's aim . . .
    But this is dubious. The latter condition is not, I think, a necessary condition.

  7. #7
    Philosophaster Climacus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    180
    Quote Originally Posted by sundarramchand View Post
    I should add, no piece can really be without complete meaning . . .
    I'm not so sure of this myself, though I mightn't know what you mean by "complete" meaning. It seems to me at least possible that a work of art - something beautiful created for beauty's sake - be without meaning.

    Edit: I'm thinking here of objective meaning, something intrinsic to the work. Rather than subjective meaning, foisted on the work extrinsically.
    Last edited by Climacus; 12-24-2011 at 01:36 AM.

  8. #8
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    3,890
    Quote Originally Posted by Climacus View Post
    I'm not so sure of this myself, though I mightn't know what you mean by "complete" meaning. It seems to me at least possible that a work of art - something beautiful created for beauty's sake - be without meaning.
    Ridiculous. Meaning, whatever something is, comes with it.

  9. #9
    Philosophaster Climacus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    180
    Quote Originally Posted by cafolini View Post
    Meaning, whatever something is, comes with it.
    How about meaningless things? "Married bachelor" is a two-word term. And a term is a thing. But "married bachelor" is meaningless. The term doesn't point to anything; thus, the term has no meaning.

    “For a single referring expression to have a meaning, it suffices that it should be possible in suitable circumstances to use it to refer to some one thing, person, place, etc” (Strawson, An Introduction to Logic Theory).

  10. #10
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    3,890
    Quote Originally Posted by Climacus View Post
    How about meaningless things? "Married bachelor" is a two-word term. And a term is a thing. But "married bachelor" is meaningless. The term doesn't point to anything; thus, the term has no meaning.

    “For a single referring expression to have a meaning, it suffices that it should be possible in suitable circumstances to use it to refer to some one thing, person, place, etc” (Strawson, An Introduction to Logic Theory).
    There you go again. Ha! Don't you realize that if it had no meaning you wouldn't even be able to talk about it? It might not even be a contradiction.
    In a planet far away a prerequisite for being married is that you be a bachelor and remain bachelor for the duration of the marriage. Any violation is considered adultery and the criminals are quartered by ropes and crocodile horses with wings.

  11. #11
    answers rhetorical ?'s
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    1,038
    Blog Entries
    76
    To reflect on the OP's explanation of the piece, this is a true story: I was wandering through an art show at the University of Wyoming a few years back and came across a piece that was described as a 'violent, vivid outburst of emotion that captured the sheer velocity of the inspiration.'
    Whatever the hell that means, I don't know. This is what it was critiquing:
    A full sheet of drywall that someone had taken a claw hammer to making a single downward angled gash, ripped the hammer out and left the **** on the floor. Then said 'artist' awkwardly stuck a 90 degree bit of copper pipe into the drywall a few inches below the gash, and turned it in.

  12. #12
    Registered User Darcy88's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    British Columbia, Canada
    Posts
    1,963
    Blog Entries
    3
    Quote Originally Posted by cafolini View Post
    Don't you realize that if it had no meaning you wouldn't even be able to talk about it?
    I agree. A married bachelor has meaning, its meaning is just contradictory.

  13. #13
    Philosophaster Climacus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    180
    Quote Originally Posted by cafolini View Post
    There you go again. Ha! Don't you realize that if it had no meaning you wouldn't even be able to talk about it? It might not even be a contradiction.
    Wow . . .

    A bachelor is an "unmarried man." (I'm going to hope you just didn't know what bachelor meant.) "Married bachelor" is synonymous with "married unmarried man." It doesn't get any more contradictory than that, p and not-p. If you think that might not be a contradiction, then you need help. Are you feeling alright?

    And of course we can talk about meaningless things. We can all string together meaningless phrases. Example: "There was an unmarried married man who wasn't. He was three inches taller than himself, and three days older than himself. His skin was all white and his skin was all black. All day long he drew four-sided triangles."

  14. #14
    Philosophaster Climacus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    180
    Quote Originally Posted by Darcy88 View Post
    I agree. A married bachelor has meaning, its meaning is just contradictory.
    “For a single referring expression to have a meaning, it suffices that it should be possible in suitable circumstances to use it to refer to some one thing, person, place, etc” (Strawson, An Introduction to Logic Theory).

  15. #15
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    2,548
    Well, way to hijack a thread with a pissing contest.

    sundar, it is a very light satire indeed. Having seen uh... challenging art like that, trying to figure out its reason for being, you tend to make up all sorts of funny things. Pieces like "Piss Christ" and Mark Rothko are coming to mind now. What is it- post modernism or something? Real life 'trolling'?

    Anyways, this small bit catches enough of that peculiar feeling.




    J

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. T.S. Eliot as a critic
    By genuis_tariq in forum Eliot, T. S.
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 02-21-2012, 11:53 AM
  2. Critics and Criticism.
    By MANICHAEAN in forum General Writing
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-24-2010, 07:32 AM
  3. Literary criticism book
    By Evaril in forum General Literature
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 01-25-2010, 09:00 AM
  4. WHat book to read for class to do a criticism?
    By SirJazzHands in forum General Literature
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 12-19-2007, 05:09 PM
  5. How can I enjoy studying criticism
    By rony in forum General Literature
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 06-18-2007, 02:34 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •