Originally Posted by
Dreamwoven
Jock Young's third and last book, The Criminological Imagination, draws heavily on Wright Mills' essay The Sociological Imagination. Wright Mills was critical of Grand Theory, especially the work of Talcott Parsons, though who today remembers Parsons' ponderous study of social structure. He has been consigned to the rubbish bin of social theory. Abstracted Empiricism remains, detailed manipulation of statistical data remains, and both Wright Mills and Jock Young made withering critiques of this kind of empty analysis.
Jock Young cites an article in Criminology from May 2003 on the question "Do police raids reduce illegal drug dealing at Nuisance Bars?
Young comments as follows:
"The findings were, incidentally, "that police intervention suppresses levels of drug dealing during periods of active enforcement but the effects largely disappear when the intervention is withdrawn. (2003, p. 257)". No comment."
Young goes on to say that "it is cutting-edge stuff" "and the authors are well-published and respected".
Young adds the following observations:
"The Article simply fascinates me. The confetti of Greek letters, beta, lambda, epsilon, the masquerade of science, the strange litany of indicators: Time, Unemp, Risk, Nuisance, Closed, Dosage and Duration, seem in a different universe from the louche bars, dope smokers, snitches and police harassment of downtown Pittsburg. It is, of course, a full-blown example of abstracted empiricism."
I spent a couple of hours writing this post.
I need help. Could someone who understands my dilemma let me know when LitNet goes back to its old format Thank you.