Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Thought crime???

  1. #1

    Smile Thought crime???

    When Winston writes in the new diary for the first time, he immediately thinks about how he committed thought crime. Does he think of this so quickly just because guilt is a natural human emotion, or because Big Brother has engraved the nonexistent laws into the minds of the people of Oceania?

  2. #2
    University student EvoWarrior5's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    126
    If one considers Foucaldian ideas on power, particularly his essay on "Panopticisms" (in his work Discipline and Punish I do believe), I would be inclined to go with the second option.

    Foucault's ideas stipulate that society is a metaphorical 'panopticon'. To illustrate this, imagine a tower with surrounding prison cells. The building is made such that one person in the tower can view every prisoner in their individual cells at all times. However, the prisoners have no way of seeing the guard. The prisoners are thus under constant watch, which forces them to adapt their behaviour according to the expectations/laws of the prison. Interestingly, though, as the prisoners have no way of seeing the guard, they also have no way of knowing if there is a guard to begin with. The guard could get up and leave the tower, but the prisoners would still feel that they might be watched at any moment, because they do not know when the tower is or is not being occupied. Their behaviour maintains a constant, submissive pattern regardless of whether anyone is actually watching over them, because they have wholly internalised the fear of being watched. (Foucault goes on to argue how modern society functions through a panoptic exertion of power, but this is not really relevant here.)

    In 1984, the telescreens can be seen to figure in this same way. And even though Winston is out of the view of his telescreen, he still experiences a constant pressure.

    (Also, I would not call the laws "non-existent". Just because they are not written down or not (always) articulated in spoken word, does not mean that they are not there. It has been too long since I have read the novel, though, so I am not sure to what extent they are spoken or unspoken.)
    Last edited by EvoWarrior5; 11-01-2016 at 07:14 AM.
    Without any form of punctuation, our language would not say "I'm perfect"; it would say "imperfect".

    "Access to works of art cannot be defined solely in terms of physical accessibility, since works of art exist only for those who have the means of understanding them."

Similar Threads

  1. Thought Crimes & Thought Police, real or not?
    By yankeeschick712 in forum 1984
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-04-2010, 08:03 PM
  2. Crime & Punishment
    By zachary33501 in forum Crime and Punishment
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 01-11-2007, 01:39 AM
  3. Crime and Punishment
    By liveoutloud in forum Crime and Punishment
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 03-17-2006, 08:22 PM
  4. Thought Crime
    By Rick in forum 1984
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-24-2005, 06:07 PM
  5. I thought Crime and Punishment was great
    By ucdawg12 in forum General Literature
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 07-31-2004, 12:04 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •