Are there any religions of peace, is a reasonable question only if we distinguish whether we mean the words of their holy texts frozen in time or the actions of their followers moving in time, as the two differ radically. Without this distinction there is no answer and no real question.
As an American on a practical level I must ask myself what I want and what I expect, and try to balance my actions between the two, for what I expect may not be what I want at all, and I must decide how much effort to invest in fighting against what I expect.
If it makes little sense to fight against what one fully expects, then of course why fight for something one fully expects, since that adds needless effort to what seems already fated as the former action fights against fate? Fortunately, such philosophical quandaries do not prevent us from compromising and acting.
What I want is reasonable religion. And of course I (you) define what is reasonable. Well, (I pulled...) could anyone else do that for me, or for you? Since I (collectively) am the host, I will determine what is reasonable and peaceful, not the other way around.
Historically and socially all religions are like dogs to me. All dogs are peaceful until something disturbs them, but I still want dogs. Trained dogs are peaceful dogs all the time in their own kennel. We are not a democracy, we are a democratic republic. We are house-trained dogs, not wild dogs. Now it is time for any wild Moslem mongrels to be trained rather than bark and snarl for their own rules in the kennel.
Don't worry, the training is easy. It only consists of syncretism, where little by little you are secularized and rationalized just as all the other religions have been, hypnotized by prosperity, all the while enjoying a freedom of lifestyle and opportunity not available in the repressive garbage pits of moslemia you fled, if you can only stand it.
It is a one way syncretism, in this case, I am afraid. Moslemia has nothing America needs to make itself better, no amendments to offer to our laws or principles or education or our way of life which would improve them. Come here drunk on religion and we will sober you up, or you will make a poor American. We do not drink hard religion anymore. Our religion is soda pop, and yours will be, too. We have a real war on any religious drunkenness which disturbs our peace.
It is hard to trust dogs who are currently behaving but that you know have not been house trained. A Moslem that has not been house trained is worse than an untrained Buddhist, yes, or a Hindu, because the Moslem comes out of a more stubborn and defiant religious tradition whose most revered text encourages some extreme violence and resistance to the ways of infidels. The Bible encourages all kinds of violence, too, but no one takes those ancient prescriptions seriously anymore in the Christian world, and that is the big difference between being house trained or wild. In moslemia, such precriptions are still taken as divine commands by a too large fringe of backward kooks.
The race is on to house train the whole of Moslemia before it tears up the house. The house is democracy, rather democratic republic. It is a big job, and I would not have taken it.
Stray dogs breed more dogs, but not necessarily more bad dogs, so there is still hope. The progeny of backward moslems and the young of moslemia in general have more time with fresh eyes under democracy to figure out just how goofy some of their elders are, and to submit to voluntary house training. Someone who is twenty-three is an elder to someone who is ten.