Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Hedda Gabler Lit Analysis - Opinions?

  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    2

    Hedda Gabler Lit Analysis - Opinions?

    So I was looking for a second opinion on this lit analysis on the play Hedda Gabler - here it is:
    How Spatial Confinement Reveals Hedda’s Feelings of Oppression
    Spatial confinement. Psychological confinement. Societal confinement. Throughout Hedda Gabler, Hedda wrestles with these inner and outer forces, ultimately losing the battle and killing herself. Restricted to her role as the dutiful and obedient housewife, Hedda struggles to make sense of her life - a life that she views as boring, but a life that she is nonetheless expected to live. Unwilling to abandon her life yet enclosed within the social expectations of her, Hedda constantly finds herself challenging her pre-established role in her life through her muffled pinings for escape. Yet, despite her lofty expectations for her life to be perfect, all her hopes end up as disappointments. Failing to resign herself to her trappings and assimilate into her role, Hedda loses the battle for her life and at last finds the escape and liberty that she has looked for all her life in death. Throughout the play, Hedda’s confinement in her house reveals her struggle with her feelings of oppression as a woman and wife.
    With a constant calm and reserved facade, Hedda Gabler seems like an imperturbable character that, though aloof at times, remains amicable. Confronted with Miss Tesman’s affection and hug, Hedda “gently [frees] herself” and lightly objects with a “Oh-! Let me go” (231). Ibsen’s depiction of Hedda with soft and gentle actions maintains her expected demeanor as a polite and taciturn wife that is grateful to her aunt-in-law and supports her husband. However, as light as Hedda's response is, her message clearly belies her docile attitude. While these actions raise little suspicion with the other characters of Mr. Tesman and Miss Tesman, who still believe that Hedda is the perfect niece and wife, Hedda’s response to Miss Tesman shows her slight annoyance with the display of affection. Uncomfortable with the situation, Hedda tries to escape Miss Tesman with as much finesse as possible. Yet, caught off guard by the unwanted physical attention, Hedda’s facade slightly falters and her underlying feelings are revealed. Through Ibsen’s use of short declarations, Hedda’s reaction to Miss Tesman’s love all but shows Hedda’s averseness to the situation, Mr. Tesman and his family.
    As perturbed as Hedda is with Mr. Tesman and Miss Tesman, it is when Hedda is left in the room alone that her true frustration with her life manifests itself. “Raising her arms and clenching her fists as if in a frenzy”, Hedda finally loses her carefully cultured calmness and lets her emotions inundate herself and the room (231). Trapped within a society that frowns upon assertive and opinionated females, Hedda has been forced to resolve herself to the situation and act the part of the docile wife, hiding her emotions and enveloping her opinions under layers of cultivated feigned complacency. With everyone gone, the room becomes a sanctuary for Hedda to divulge her true vehement ire towards her situation and provides a look into Hedda's inner mind. The stage directions and Hedda’s physically aggressive movements reveal her suppressed feelings of oppression that she dare not express in front of company and show the exasperated face behind the looking glass. Through Hedda’s near temper tantrum, Ibsen divulges her true anger towards her trappings, towards her role as a wife, and towards her role as a proper woman.
    The room is a physical trap, and it represents Hedda’s psychological and societal limitations as a woman who can’t escape her designated role. It serves as a parallel to her battles with the expectations of her to be a complacent and unassertive wife. As Hedda “moves about the room…[and] flings back the curtains from the glass door,” she is also flinging back the curtains of the expectations in her life (231). Looking out the window, Hedda sees the possibilities of another life, a freer life where nothing is expected of her and she can live and act how she desires. Nevertheless, she does not go outside and she does not leave behind her orthodox life. The act of opening the curtains is the physical manifestation of Hedda’s longing for escape and her struggle to reconcile her desires for freedom with her struggle to escape the oppressiveness of the room of behavioral constraints. Hedda struggles to free herself both mentally and physically from the confinements in her life. As Hedda paces about the room, she demonstrates the inner quandary that she faces in her struggle to escape and to live within this room that she so restlessly wants to leave.
    However, as soon as her husband returns to the room, Hedda “again calm and controlled” plays the role of the pristine wife perfectly as she replies nonchalantly to her husband’s question about what she was looking at outside with “I’m just looking at the leaves” (231). Completely juxtaposing her earlier pensive, even existential, behavior towards her role in her life, Hedda has once again adopted her perfected facade of the supportive and placid vanilla wife. The stage directions dictating her calmness and the way that she speaks and the content of her words, or lack thereof, all go to reinforce her consummate front - the same front that she adopted with Miss Tesman. Unable to communicate with her oblivious husband, who for the most part is satisfied with his role in life, Hedda instead says something about the seemingly meaningless topic of leaves - something that he understands and expects from Hedda as a woman. Nevertheless, the casual afterthought about the withered state of the leaves being “so yellow - and so withered” discloses Hedda’s inner feelings of decrepitude from years of being trapped in her role as a woman (231). Even though so blatantly said, Hedda’s drawing of parallels between herself and the leaves evokes no reaction or response from her naive husband, who still believes that his wife is happy in her situation. The ignorance of her husband and his failure to comprehend anything but her homemaker behavior further demonstrates Hedda’s feelings of oppression in her house. Even in her own house with her own husband, she cannot speak freely about her hopelessness and instead has to suppress her emotions.
    Just as Hedda is confined to this house because of her marriage and her role as a proper wife and homemaker, so she is confined to the frame of expected docile behavior because she is a woman. When Hedda realizes that she has already been with her husband for months and will continue to remain there for an interminable amount of time, she is “once more restless” (231). The depiction of Hedda’s behavior once again shows her earnest longing to leave her role, her life, and her marriage. She is not only contesting with her physical environment in her movement about the room, but also with the psychological confinements that she and the other people in her life have been conditioned to live within from the day she was born. Hedda simply does not know how to face this situation and cannot do anything about it. Unable to accept her life but unable to escape, Hedda “[leaves] the glass door” and continues to dutifully live her life (231).
    Designated roles. They cage us mentally and physically. Although this play dealt primarily with the archaic limitations and trappings of a woman in Victorian times, it also appealed to the enclosures and struggles that we all face from time to time in our lives - the cages and roles that we are forced to adopt and live in because of the still persisting expectations. For Hedda, her role as a wife and a woman constricted her in her house. No matter how passionately she wanted to escape her feelings and her role, Hedda was confined by ossified expectations in both her and the people around who never truly understood or heard her and could never help her. Hedda instead imprinted her emotions on the unseeing and unlistening walls of the very rooms that she was confined in. Even though Hedda lived in a luxurious house and had a luxurious life, this house was merely a reflection of her feelings. Just as the house and her husband were trapped in debt, so Hedda was trapped in her luxurious life with nowhere to go and no one to save her. Hedda was bound to her life with ropes that could only be burned by the spark of a pistol.

    Works Cited:
    Ibsen, Henrik. Hedda Gabler. Trans. Rolf Fjelde. New York: Signet Classics. 2006. Print.

  2. #2
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    3,123
    It's ok as far as it goes but I would not use words like Vanilla or Victorian. King Victoria was not a Norse. You could do with more quotation if it's yours. It's a bit unoriginal.

  3. #3
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    3,123
    I notice also a change of tense that seems out of place. Try to make a little more of the fact that this text is a drama script. Have you watched it in performance?

  4. #4
    the beloved: Gladys's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    1,609
    Wow, finally a decent post on Ibsen! I happened, just two hours ago, to listen to an audiobook on the last act of Hedda Gabler.

    Hedda, unlike Elvested and Logborg and finally even Tesman, is not so much restricted to her role as the dutiful and obedient housewife but, through cowardice, chooses to restrict herself. You, Tiliu, say that Throughout the play, Hedda’s confinement in her house reveals her struggle with her feelings of oppression as a woman and wife but, above all, she struggles with feelings of oppression as an expectant mother, to which the play makes a dozen, none too subtle, allusions from start to finish. Hedda not only loses the battle for her life but intentionally takes the the life of her unborn child, her new and solemn "responsibility". Pregnant Hedda's action was likely even more shocking then, in conservative and religious Norway, than now.

    You say, While these actions raise little suspicion with the other characters of Mr. Tesman and Miss Tesman, who still believe that Hedda is the perfect niece and wife, Hedda’s response to Miss Tesman shows her slight annoyance with the display of affection. Aunt Tesman sees a great deal more than she shows and, not least, Hedda's well-advanced pregnancy. (Brack sees this too.) Hedda’s averseness to the situation is best expressed by her unbounded envy of Thea Elvsted, who has abandoned husband, step-children, friends and town to follow Eilert Lövborg's child wherever it may lead. Thea, the married woman (a magistrate's wife) following, uninvited, after the dissolute Lovborg! There was a time when the teenage Hedda might have done the same had she the courage. Her unbridled jealousy of Thea reaches a terrible climax in the last Act.

    You exaggerate in saying Hedda plays the role of the pristine wife perfectly. Rather Tesman is too thick and the rest far too polite to call Hedda out. You say, Even in her own house with her own husband, she cannot speak freely about her hopelessness and instead has to suppress her emotions. Nevertheless, she speaks freely enough with Brack and Lovborg.

    You say, Designated roles. They cage us mentally and physically. Hedda cages herself. A young Ibsen left Norway for Italy to escape the same cage. You say, Just as the house and her husband were trapped in debt, so Hedda was trapped in her luxurious life with nowhere to go and no one to save her. Hedda was bound to her life with ropes that could only be burned by the spark of a pistol. Hedda rather escapes her confining life by the courageous act, she had recommended to Lovborg: shooting herself through the temple...and killing her unborn child. Thus she ends Brack's blackmail and the dreadful spectacle of Thea and Jorgen having the courage she lacks. It's all very tawdry.

    Arrogant, manipulating, and dangerous, Hedda wants excitement in life, without the risk (scandal). She counts as nothing: work, home, family and friends; and in the end her 'beautiful' suicide is simply miserable and pathetic. The character of Hedda is in stark contrast with frail Thea and weak Jorgen, who prevail gloriously at the close of the play. The play deliberately ends with a glowing nativity scene around the manger with the newborn child. At last Thea Elvsted and her messianic child find a happy home with her Joseph - her old flame, the orphan, Jorgen Tesman. (Aunt Julianna, who houses them becomes the aged Anna - Luke 2:36 - present at the nativity) A truly happy ending.
    "Love does not alter the beloved, it alters itself"

Similar Threads

  1. Find a 1984 Gabler edition if you can
    By Macintosh in forum Ulysses
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-06-2010, 02:26 AM
  2. Need opinions to help with my analysis! :)
    By robinhuynh in forum Poems, Poets, and Poetry
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 02-14-2010, 03:18 AM
  3. What upsets Hedda?
    By Gladys in forum Hedda Gabler
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 05-29-2009, 12:47 AM
  4. Opinions of Hedda
    By Dinarzade in forum Hedda Gabler
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 02-12-2009, 10:58 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •