Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: D H Lawrence: Lady Chatterley's Lover

  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    543

    D H Lawrence: Lady Chatterley's Lover

    This was written in the late 1920s, shortly before Lawrence's death. It is set in the Industrial midlands of England, where Lawrence was raised, and details the sexual affair between an upper class lady and a local gamekeeper. [SPOILER ALERT]. Constance is from an upper middle class anglo-Scottish family. She is a bit of an intellectual and Bohemian who marries an English aristocrat named Clifford. Clifford then goes off to the trenches and returns paralyzed from the waist down. At first Constance stands by him. She later has an unfulfilling affair with a young Irish playwright who visits her husband. Gradually what is left of the marriage breaks down and she begins an affair with her husband's gamekeeper Mellors. Constance becomes pregnant, the affair is revealed, her husband refuses to agree to a divorce and the couple are left in a kind of limbo, but agree to wait.

    This is a surprising novel in almost every way. First of all, it really isn't all that explicit or shocking. The sexual passages make up about 5% of the book. And whatever else they are, they are not pornographic- quite the opposite in fact. Lawrence thought sex important and was determined to break down taboos. He also thought sexual repression unhealthy and dangerous. But, he was oddly puritanical as well. He loathed the idea of casual sex, and the relationship between the couple, though it is described in detail, is tender, loving and respectful. And the characters are not quite what you'd expect either. Constance is not a sexually repressed upper class neurotic. In her youth she had had sexual affairs, but had regarded them as much less interesting than the intellectual conversations she enjoyed with her lovers. Mellors is not some great, brutal, mindless force of nature. He is 39 and celibate and has even spent time as an officer in the British army, though his background is essentially working class. In fact, he seems tired and broken when she first meets him.

    Overall it is kind of dull. Critics often accuse Lawrence of lacking any interest in individual characterization, which, if Lady Chatterley is anything to go by, is certainly true. Even Mellors, who is supposed to be the great regenerating force, doesn't seem quite real somehow. In fact, it's an oddly depressing novel. But I would still recommend it. Lawrence may not have made much effort to create interesting, individual characters, but then that isn't his ambition. What he wants is to reconnect his readers with the wonder and mystery of life. It is often said that Lawrence may have been shocking and exciting to an early 20th century audience, but that he isn't to a 21st century audience. I don't agree. I think we overestimate how sexually repressed people were. And in any case, his stuff on sex is not so interesting as his descriptions of nature. That, for me, is where Lawrence can rival any writer in history. When he writes about the strange miracle of life, and about how disconnected and half-dead we are, he is more important. I'd say the average westerner is even more removed and disconnected from what Lawrence would have called 'the heart of life' than they were in the 1920s. My ambition now is to work my way through as much Lawrence as I can. I regard myself as just as jaded, numb, depressed and half-dead as anyone, and Lawrence is a great antidote to that.

    (btw, if anyone else is interested in Lawrence and doesn't know where to start, I'd urge you to read the opening chapter of his novel 'The Rainbow'. That is Lawrence at his best. He opens by describing the deep, unspoken, intuitive connection a family of English farmers have with the farmland on which they work. It is wonderful. If you don't like it, you won't like Lawrence)

  2. #2
    Registered User Emil Miller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    London, England
    Posts
    6,499
    Well done Wickes, an excellent review. I haven't read Lawrence myself but ever since I read that Philip Larkin rated Sons and Lovers as one of the best novels written in English, I've had the feeling that perhaps I should have done.
    "L'art de la statistique est de tirer des conclusions erronèes a partir de chiffres exacts." Napoléon Bonaparte.

    "Je crois que beaucoup de gens sont dans cet état d’esprit: au fond, ils ne sentent pas concernés par l’Histoire. Mais pourtant, de temps à autre, l’Histoire pose sa main sur eux." Michel Houellebecq.

  3. #3
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    543
    Quote Originally Posted by Emil Miller View Post
    Philip Larkin rated Sons and Lovers as one of the best novels written in English
    Yes, Larkin revered Lawrence (which is odd considering that Lawrence had a passionate love of life, while Larkin came to see life as a bad joke!). Anthony Burgess called him one of the five best novelists of the 20th century, and Aldous Huxley also admired him.

    I think it's important to know what to look for when you read Lawrence. He wasn't concerned with creating an exciting plot or in drawing distinct, individual characters. What interested Lawrence was life itself- life with a capital 'L'. One critic wrote that "even the worst pages of his worst novels dance with life", and it's that vivid, intense aliveness in the here and now that makes him worth reading. I'd definitely recommend reading the opening paragraph of The Rainbow. It's amazing stuff.

  4. #4
    Registered User Jackson Richardson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Somewhere in the South East of England
    Posts
    1,273
    For what it's worth, I believe Lady Chat was banned mainly on the basis of the use of the F word.
    Previously JonathanB

    The more I read, the more I shall covet to read. Robert Burton The Anatomy of Melancholy Partion3, Section 1, Member 1, Subsection 1

  5. #5
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    northern england
    Posts
    123
    the scandal around Lady Chatterley's lover was that a lady of a considerably higher social status would have relations with a gamekeeper. Famously at the trial in 63 concerning the lifting of the ban on the book the lawyer on the side of the ban addressed the jury and said 'would you let your servants read this?' perhaps one can talk about britain in the 50s and 60s as containing a burgeoning 'lower' middle class, grammar school educated people etc who would've found the mores expressed in this question antiquated. I guess societies are always in transition but philip Larkin was inspired to say even more famously, not long after the trial, tongue in cheek no doubt, that sex was invented in 1963. The pill had something to do with it as well of course...

  6. #6
    Inexplicably Undiscovered
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    next door to the lady in the vinegar bottle
    Posts
    5,089
    Blog Entries
    72
    This is an excellent review, followed by astute replies. Well done, Gentlemen.

  7. #7
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Redwood Empire
    Posts
    1,569
    I remember enjoying Sons And Lovers much more than Chatterly.

Similar Threads

  1. Lady Chatterley's Lover
    By osho in forum Lady Chatterley's Lover
    Replies: 108
    Last Post: 03-13-2012, 07:55 AM
  2. Lady Chatterley's Lover
    By Kendra in forum Lady Chatterley's Lover
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 10-10-2010, 11:20 PM
  3. Lady Chatterley's lover
    By Lidia R in forum Lady Chatterley's Lover
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 05-15-2010, 09:15 AM
  4. lady Chatterley - D.H.LAWRENCE
    By Julietm in forum Lady Chatterley's Lover
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-28-2007, 12:29 AM
  5. Lady Chatterley's Lover
    By Anne in forum Lady Chatterley's Lover
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-24-2005, 06:07 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •