Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Do We Condemn Joan?

  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    55

    Do We Condemn Joan?

    When it comes to Tess' villains, the usual candidates are Alec, Angel and Joan. Alec the obvious melodramatic villain. Angel doesn't intend to be cruel to Tess, but he makes her more miserable than anyone. And then there's Joan who sets up Alec to ruin Tess partly to bring some money into the Derbyfield household. It's easy to condemn each, but Hardy provides enough character development to invite our empathy. Each villain had his or her reasons.

    Joan and Tess as young women were much alike in full bodied sexual appeal. Also, both were born into a low social rung with little opportunity to advance. But, with some luck and willingness both could advance using their sexual appeal to bond with men of higher rank. Joan took this route, but Tess wouldn't consider such a scheme. Parents often don't understand their children and in that difference parents tend to assume parents know best. Moreover, parents tend to assume responsibility to bend their child's thinking to their, not out of malice but in genuine conviction it's their responsibility. Joan was convinced Tess had a great opportunity to bond with the wealthy Alec, not just for the sake of the Derbyfield household but for Tess' benefit, also. By Joan's standards the plan blossomed. However, by Tess' thinking, incomprehensible to Joan, life with Alec was intolerable.

    That Joan set Tess up for her ruin was villainous, but not all villainous acts merit condemnation. The underlying reason for Joan's villainy, her not understanding Tess and assuming she knew best, is common to all parents. Most of us can't condemn Joan unless we're willing to condemn ourselves.

  2. #2
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    37
    Can I add John Durbeyfield to the list of villains? He seemed to care very little for Tess' well being, being merely concerned with his own social advancement. When his elaborate tombstone is erected, I wondered if the idea of this showiness was his brainchild. He has never been clever with money, but to never even think that such a piece of extravagance and arrogance such as the wording of his tombstone would further impoverish his family is almost beyond comprehension. In fact, it is not only Tess who is affected by this, but the whole family. If we look at the misfortunes of Tess' life from the beginning of the novel, we find that most are originally caused by John Durbeyfield. His drunkenness which caused her to be obliged to drive the old horse, his reticence for his children to work due to their privileged heritage and his habit of spreading all his plans for the family's advancement through Tess in the village and even her mortification at his unusual use of the carriage while she is at the country dance all make life more difficult for his unhappy daughter.

Similar Threads

  1. Aphorism #270 Do not condemn alone that which pleases all.
    By Admin in forum Balthasar Gracian's The Art of Worldly Wisdom
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-10-2012, 03:20 AM
  2. Aphorism #270 Do not condemn alone that which pleases all.
    By Admin in forum Balthasar Gracian's The Art of Worldly Wisdom
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-15-2009, 03:20 AM
  3. Aphorism #270 Do not condemn alone that which pleases all.
    By Admin in forum Balthasar Gracian's The Art of Worldly Wisdom
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-25-2007, 06:40 AM
  4. St. Joan! Y'all forgot St. Joan!
    By Rosie Cotton in forum Shaw, George Bernard
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-07-2007, 04:56 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •