Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Two Angry Forces

  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    269
    Blog Entries
    2

    Two Angry Forces

    “Hi, Science. How are you?” greeted Nature.

    “Hi, Nature. I’m fine thank you. How about you?” asked Science.

    “I’m not fine. As you know, I’m changing badly every day, and it’s because of you.”

    “Oh! Not again. You always look forward to detest me.”

    “No, it’s not fun for me to do so. It is my concern towards my home and you don’t understand it.”

    “What did you say? I don’t understand it? It’s you who don’t understand anything, you don’t understand Science. You create calamities and disasters and stand as an obstacle for the development I’m bringing in the world. You don’t have a right to talk about me in the first place,” said Science.

    “How dare you talk about my rights? What about the rights that you snatched away from me? Who gave you the right to destroy my home every day? With the pretext of development you’re actually destroying the resources I put in into the Earth. You are so confused. You don’t know what you want. You are greedy and you’re never satisfied of your hunger. As a result you’re consuming me every day.”

    “Nonsense. I am destroying you? I’m the one who is actually shaping you up. I invent new things. I make people’s life comfortable. I make them live happily with lots of luxuries and with ease; but you come here and say I’m a destroyer. I pity your ignorance, my dear Nature.”


    “Inventions. Luxuries. Comforts. Great words you used. But what did the invention of an Atom bomb do to my home? It killed 166,000 people in Hiroshima and another 80,000 in Nagasaki. What do you call it, a great invention? What did a machine gun do to the world? It consumed countless of lives in the wars fought till date, and the count is still marching forward every day. What do you call it, a luxury? What are the myriad industries and factories doing to the pure Nature today? They are all polluting away the purest form of air ever existed, and eventually polluting people’s lives too. What do you call it, comfort? Now, tell me who is truly ignorant?” asked Nature.


    “I made people rich. I made technological innovations. I made machines that are running the world now, those without which people would never get to know what can be the level of convenience for a human being. I’m shaping countries, giving power to people and creating a future,” said Science.


    “Yes, you truly brought in more comforts into my people’s lives and I thank you for that, but in return to those comforts you took away the limits that human beings hold on to at their desires. You made my people greedy for material things. You made them do insensate deeds towards other people, all for wars, all for power, all for gaining physical material possessions and become rich. You lost me my true singular principle that I created the world with, the affectionate human connection between one another. Wars were being fought in search of one person. Nations play tactics over each other to move forward economically, forgetting the brotherly human ethics, all just to become rich. You created chaos more than comfort,” said Nature.


    “You’re not blameless either. You play with people’s lives. You destroy them with your calamities. People build a proper livelihood over years and you shatter it all in just a matter of minutes with the Earth quakes. People make a living around the coasts and you wash away their dreams of future with just a heavy tide in the mask of tsunamis. People work in agriculture day in and day out putting into it their entire strength of both physical and mental lives for months and you turn it all shapeless and destroy everything in a one night cyclone. Volcanic eruptions, Floods, Cyclones, Earth quakes, Limnic eruptions, Meteorological disasters, Blizzards, Droughts, Tornadoes all summed up results in the loss of hundreds of millions of most valuable human lives, let alone the infrastructure loss they create,” said Science. “What did you do to the Earth’s biggest scientific invention, the Nuclear power, in the Fukushima mishap in Japan and in many other such outbursts? I wished to take the whole world to new heights by blending the nuclear power into people’s lives and make them powerful forever in possible aspects. I wanted to give them nuclear electricity, pollution free technology, security and a lot more. But you demolished that precious path in just a matter of days and made the world fear my nuclear technology.”


    “Dear Science, before you talk about Fukushima nuclear disaster, let’s talk about Chernobyl nuclear power plant explosion. It was the biggest scientific disaster ever to happen in the history of mankind, causing more than 985,000 premature cancer deaths world wide which were a result of the nuclear radiation conflated into the atmosphere that day. It was a man made disaster. It was a signboard cautioning the human beings how adverse and fatal the decisions of Man can be towards the well-being of its species. And, what about Bhopal gas cataclysm that killed many people just at a breath of the poised air? Should a development be that disastrous? And about your nuclear power rise, what arose the need for the development of such dangerous nuclear technologies which if gone wrong would stand as a threat to the entire life on earth? Yes, you needed nuclear electricity because you made the water in the world deplete to lowest heights, thus resulting in low water production that can't provide enough electricity to satisfy the human needs for future. You needed less pollution now, because you now realized the peril you’ve brought upon yourself in the form of Global Warming. If you would’ve maintained everything in the proper proportions from the very beginning, you would not have tried for the invention of such terror-stricken technologies like nuclear power and atomic bombs. With the encounter of all the above events it ought to be clear to you by now that be it development or destruction, you’re making it for yourself, dear Science. But, it is my responsibility to count for the well-being of my home in the long run, so when something catastrophic is in the queue, I involve to clean up and be an eye opener. Cyclone and tsunami that occurred in Fukushima was one such result. Because of that, people all around the world have to a great extent realized the disorder that is resulting in the name of development, and started to take required measures to put a check on such nuclear catastrophes in the future. I have to teach lessons to my kids sometimes, even if it might cost me something, because that is what will stay in the times yet to come,” said Nature.

    .......................!

    And the discussion goes on, but for how long??!

    Nature and Science are not two different things, they are something that live within one another. A balance is to be maintained between Science and Nature without craving for naïve explorations that jeopardize the sustenance that flows between every Human being to walk on the Earth. Let us not cripple the bridge in between, and thus fall into the abyss at the cost of self. Overwhelmed with comforts let us not ignore the basic environmental responsibility we all carry in our lives today. With the unending thirst for power, arrogant upper hand over the other nations and in search for personal comforts even at the cost of planet’s long life, we’re actually bluffing ourselves in front of a bonfire that is gradually burning up the home we live in.

    So, by using the great repository of knowledge that is gifted to mankind in the form of Science let us all be good Human beings towards Nature and make this haven a human Heaven.

    Written by:Krishna Kanth (Me)

  2. #2
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    3,890
    Quote Originally Posted by krishna_lit View Post
    “Hi, Science. How are you?” greeted Nature.

    “Hi, Nature. I’m fine thank you. How about you?” asked Science.

    “I’m not fine. As you know, I’m changing badly every day, and it’s because of you.”

    “Oh! Not again. You always look forward to detest me.”

    “No, it’s not fun for me to do so. It is my concern towards my home and you don’t understand it.”

    “What did you say? I don’t understand it? It’s you who don’t understand anything, you don’t understand Science. You create calamities and disasters and stand as an obstacle for the development I’m bringing in the world. You don’t have a right to talk about me in the first place,” said Science.

    “How dare you talk about my rights? What about the rights that you snatched away from me? Who gave you the right to destroy my home every day? With the pretext of development you’re actually destroying the resources I put in into the Earth. You are so confused. You don’t know what you want. You are greedy and you’re never satisfied of your hunger. As a result you’re consuming me every day.”

    “Nonsense. I am destroying you? I’m the one who is actually shaping you up. I invent new things. I make people’s life comfortable. I make them live happily with lots of luxuries and with ease; but you come here and say I’m a destroyer. I pity your ignorance, my dear Nature.”


    “Inventions. Luxuries. Comforts. Great words you used. But what did the invention of an Atom bomb do to my home? It killed 166,000 people in Hiroshima and another 80,000 in Nagasaki. What do you call it, a great invention? What did a machine gun do to the world? It consumed countless of lives in the wars fought till date, and the count is still marching forward every day. What do you call it, a luxury? What are the myriad industries and factories doing to the pure Nature today? They are all polluting away the purest form of air ever existed, and eventually polluting people’s lives too. What do you call it, comfort? Now, tell me who is truly ignorant?” asked Nature.


    “I made people rich. I made technological innovations. I made machines that are running the world now, those without which people would never get to know what can be the level of convenience for a human being. I’m shaping countries, giving power to people and creating a future,” said Science.


    “Yes, you truly brought in more comforts into my people’s lives and I thank you for that, but in return to those comforts you took away the limits that human beings hold on to at their desires. You made my people greedy for material things. You made them do insensate deeds towards other people, all for wars, all for power, all for gaining physical material possessions and become rich. You lost me my true singular principle that I created the world with, the affectionate human connection between one another. Wars were being fought in search of one person. Nations play tactics over each other to move forward economically, forgetting the brotherly human ethics, all just to become rich. You created chaos more than comfort,” said Nature.


    “You’re not blameless either. You play with people’s lives. You destroy them with your calamities. People build a proper livelihood over years and you shatter it all in just a matter of minutes with the Earth quakes. People make a living around the coasts and you wash away their dreams of future with just a heavy tide in the mask of tsunamis. People work in agriculture day in and day out putting into it their entire strength of both physical and mental lives for months and you turn it all shapeless and destroy everything in a one night cyclone. Volcanic eruptions, Floods, Cyclones, Earth quakes, Limnic eruptions, Meteorological disasters, Blizzards, Droughts, Tornadoes all summed up results in the loss of hundreds of millions of most valuable human lives, let alone the infrastructure loss they create,” said Science. “What did you do to the Earth’s biggest scientific invention, the Nuclear power, in the Fukushima mishap in Japan and in many other such outbursts? I wished to take the whole world to new heights by blending the nuclear power into people’s lives and make them powerful forever in possible aspects. I wanted to give them nuclear electricity, pollution free technology, security and a lot more. But you demolished that precious path in just a matter of days and made the world fear my nuclear technology.”


    “Dear Science, before you talk about Fukushima nuclear disaster, let’s talk about Chernobyl nuclear power plant explosion. It was the biggest scientific disaster ever to happen in the history of mankind, causing more than 985,000 premature cancer deaths world wide which were a result of the nuclear radiation conflated into the atmosphere that day. It was a man made disaster. It was a signboard cautioning the human beings how adverse and fatal the decisions of Man can be towards the well-being of its species. And, what about Bhopal gas cataclysm that killed many people just at a breath of the poised air? Should a development be that disastrous? And about your nuclear power rise, what arose the need for the development of such dangerous nuclear technologies which if gone wrong would stand as a threat to the entire life on earth? Yes, you needed nuclear electricity because you made the water in the world deplete to lowest heights, thus resulting in low water production that can't provide enough electricity to satisfy the human needs for future. You needed less pollution now, because you now realized the peril you’ve brought upon yourself in the form of Global Warming. If you would’ve maintained everything in the proper proportions from the very beginning, you would not have tried for the invention of such terror-stricken technologies like nuclear power and atomic bombs. With the encounter of all the above events it ought to be clear to you by now that be it development or destruction, you’re making it for yourself, dear Science. But, it is my responsibility to count for the well-being of my home in the long run, so when something catastrophic is in the queue, I involve to clean up and be an eye opener. Cyclone and tsunami that occurred in Fukushima was one such result. Because of that, people all around the world have to a great extent realized the disorder that is resulting in the name of development, and started to take required measures to put a check on such nuclear catastrophes in the future. I have to teach lessons to my kids sometimes, even if it might cost me something, because that is what will stay in the times yet to come,” said Nature.

    .......................!

    And the discussion goes on, but for how long??!

    Nature and Science are not two different things, they are something that live within one another. A balance is to be maintained between Science and Nature without craving for naïve explorations that jeopardize the sustenance that flows between every Human being to walk on the Earth. Let us not cripple the bridge in between, and thus fall into the abyss at the cost of self. Overwhelmed with comforts let us not ignore the basic environmental responsibility we all carry in our lives today. With the unending thirst for power, arrogant upper hand over the other nations and in search for personal comforts even at the cost of planet’s long life, we’re actually bluffing ourselves in front of a bonfire that is gradually burning up the home we live in.

    So, by using the great repository of knowledge that is gifted to mankind in the form of Science let us all be good Human beings towards Nature and make this haven a human Heaven.

    Written by:Krishna Kanth (Me)
    There is no angry force in science and regarding nature, there is no split with science. We are going to globalize democracy. In God we trust.

  3. #3
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    6,053
    Science = Bad : Nature = Good.
    That summarizes what you took an awful lot of words to say - simplistic in the extreme.
    You've no doubt spent a lot of time gathering information for this 'essay' but it ends up sounding like a rather naive homily.

    H

  4. #4
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    269
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by hillwalker View Post
    Science = Bad : Nature = Good.

    H
    That wasn't my point at all... I was only telling that a balance is a necessity between both. Science here is a personification of our human race's desire for growing comfort which is presently causing many fateful situations to the world. I support both sides, Nature & Science, after all, one thing is nothing without the other.

  5. #5
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    3,890
    Quote Originally Posted by hillwalker View Post
    Science = Bad : Nature = Good.
    That summarizes what you took an awful lot of words to say - simplistic in the extreme.
    You've no doubt spent a lot of time gathering information for this 'essay' but it ends up sounding like a rather naive homily.

    H
    I think he spent a lot of time gathering disinformation, not information.

  6. #6
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    6,053
    Quote Originally Posted by cafolini View Post
    I think he spent a lot of time gathering disinformation, not information.


    H

  7. #7
    Original Poster Buh4Bee's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    At the north border
    Posts
    3,381
    Blog Entries
    156
    I read this last night on the blogs and I also had a similar reaction to this as Hillwalker. I can tell that time was put into this essay, but it's rather simplistic in its view. The writings not bad, but the points you make need further development or to be trashed all together.

  8. #8
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    269
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by Buh4Bee View Post
    I read this last night on the blogs and I also had a similar reaction to this as Hillwalker. I can tell that time was put into this essay, but it's rather simplistic in its view. The writings not bad, but the points you make need further development or to be trashed all together.
    I would like to ask what is actually wrong in the essay??? I don't get what people here mean by 'disinformation.'

  9. #9
    confidentially pleased cacian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    London
    Posts
    13,930
    Quote Originally Posted by cafolini View Post
    There is no angry force in science and regarding nature, there is no split with science. We are going to globalize democracy. In God we trust.
    Ah well there is no science only nature and with regard to science it only came about because an angered manner thought it cleverer then it.
    It is bit like a game nature says: I do it this way and science says: I do it better
    the nature says: I do everything and science says: I do anything better then you
    Nature is no anger science is.
    Democracy is not freedom and freedom is not democracy. Globalise free thinking and get rid of science and democracy and let leave of god out of it. He is not amongst the living.
    Nature is what is intended and thoughts are free to roam upon it.
    Last edited by cacian; 11-04-2012 at 10:39 AM.
    it may never try
    but when it does it sigh
    it is just that
    good
    it fly

  10. #10
    Beyond the world aliengirl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Blue Planet
    Posts
    2,394
    Quote Originally Posted by krishna_lit View Post
    I would like to ask what is actually wrong in the essay??? I don't get what people here mean by 'disinformation.'
    I usually don't give advice to people about writing because here you'll find people who do this better than me. But I was attracted by the title of your thread and as I've read it, I'll tell you what's wrong with it - your concept of science. You've said -

    Science here is a personification of our human race's desire for growing comfort which is presently causing many fateful situations to the world.
    Science is not what you've said. Choosing it as a personification of greed/desire seems to me like choosing chair as a personification of sunlight.

    So please first get a clear idea of what is science and then try to rewrite the whole essay or whatever it is.
    I must create a system, or be enslaved by another man's. ~ William Blake

    Captivity is consciousness,
    So's liberty. ~ Emily Dickinson

  11. #11
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    6,053
    Quote Originally Posted by aliengirl View Post
    I'll tell you what's wrong with it - your concept of science.
    Science is not what you've said.
    I have to agree. Science is man's struggle to make sense of nature and his world - and his attempts to discover the way everything works then make use of that knowledge to improve our life and ensure we are able to remain in harmony with our planet if possible. Without science there would be no mass-communication or long-distance travel so we would as likely as not be unaware of the plight of endangered species, for example.

    There have been man-made disasters of course, some as a result of scientists applying their knowledge inappropriately or short-sightedly. But there are also natural disasters about which man has no control.

    Simplifying the issues the way you do here by personifying the two might be an amusing exercise but it's hardly a well-reasoned or accurate exploration of the balance between man and nature.

    H

Similar Threads

  1. 'Angry Young Men'
    By LitNetIsGreat in forum General Literature
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 01-30-2019, 06:13 PM
  2. Religious forces integrate or disintegrate humanity?
    By blazeofglory in forum Religious Texts
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-23-2009, 11:47 AM
  3. This Angry Fire
    By breathtest in forum Personal Poetry
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 04-25-2009, 07:44 AM
  4. The Angry Man’s Ride
    By beroq in forum General Writing
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-02-2009, 10:50 AM
  5. Tolstoy and External Forces
    By mono in forum General Literature
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-28-2005, 03:47 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •