Minutes, seconds, the like.
Minutes, seconds, the like.
"He had a word, too. Love, he called it. But I had been used to words for a long time. I knew that that word was like the others: just a shape to fill a lack; that when the right time came, you wouldn't need a word for that any more than for pride or fear."
-As I Lay Dying, William Faulkner
I disagree: sound is a series of vibrating waves that CAN BE perceived by the ear. Just because you don't perceive it doesn't mean it didn't happen or doesn't exist. Did the planets in other galaxies not exist because there was no human sense to perceive them before high-powered telescopes exist?
When somebody annoys you, remember: it takes 42 muscles to frown, but only 4 to reach out and slap someone in the face!
"He had a word, too. Love, he called it. But I had been used to words for a long time. I knew that that word was like the others: just a shape to fill a lack; that when the right time came, you wouldn't need a word for that any more than for pride or fear."
-As I Lay Dying, William Faulkner
You cannot separate time from space, as Minkowksi noted in 1908, deriving this from special relativity. So what we get is spacetime. Each event in spacetime has four coordinates: three of space, and one of time. They are called spacetime events. The distance between them is known as the spacetime interval. This implies that just as all locations in space exist, so too do all events in time. The past, present and future all exist.
What about tinnitus - that's a sound, but not perceived in an ear. Or the memory of a sound? And given that you can't hear everything this precise moment, then doesn't sound almost always involve memory? And what about auditory hallucinations? Or the Buddha speaking to you from the God Realm?
What we were referring to was the definition of sound and whether there is sound if no-one hears it - you know the tree falling in the forest idea when no-one is around. The point I was making is that there can't be a sound unless it is perceived by an ear to interpret it.
Your points take us outside of that definition. Tinnitus - I can't comment because i don't kow what causes it, but as it is an abnormal medical condition is it a fair point?
The memory of a sound is still previously interpreted, so I don't see there's a problem with that. As for the memory of sound, presumably this is he gap between the sensory organs picking up the sound and the brain interpreting it. That seems consistent with what we've been saying that sound is perceived and modified by the brain; that it is not inherently existing of itself.
Presumably auditory hallucinations are produced by the chemical interaction of the sensory organs, brain and memory. More than that I can really say, but it seems consistent with the theory.
The Buddha speaking rom the God realms is an intersting idea. I think that ability is developed/ karmically present - not bestowed. Again I know nothing of how that would work, but idon't think it contradicts the theory.
Timing existence is an impossible task.
Exitentialism goes beyond time even further then it.
If we are unable to time existence then time only exists in relation to one. Meaning timing is one to one.
So if time is not palpable then it is only half met.
Everything else that is is certain to be because we not only see it but we feel it too.
Last edited by cacian; 11-05-2012 at 03:49 PM.
exhale
inhale
nothing more
to fail
then a parapet
of hail
passerelle would rail
Bookmarks