Page 9 of 11 FirstFirst ... 4567891011 LastLast
Results 121 to 135 of 160

Thread: Ayn Rand

  1. #121
    Sweet farewell, Good Nite
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    2,336
    Quote Originally Posted by quikmart View Post
    Anyone who has reached the middle of Atlas Shrugged must have noticed that Rand is repeating herself. By the time you finish it, the 'key' statements of Rand's 'philosophy' will each have been repeated 10 times or more, employing exactly the same language, as if Rand is plagarizing herself.

    Rand's philosophy is weak because 1) it's old - it's social darwinism painted a nice modern industrial gray, and 2) it is thin - thus the repetition. For the majority of us, who do not have the skill to invent new industrial processes and are unlikely to become captains of industry, Rand's philosophy is empty and dismissive. One does not need a philosophy to be a cog in the machine that runs the world. One needs to fulfill one's function, to be a tool for the use of those better equipped to decide what kind of life is the right one.

    It has always seemed to me that the attraction of Rand's novels lay in the way she described sexual dominance and submission, making the subject acceptable for the reading public of the late 40s and 50s. I imagine it was largely this that made her an icon at the time; interestingly, it was the last thing her public would openly identify as attractive. They preferred to talk about a barely existent "philosophy". Again, in this regard she repeats herself endlessly - the heroine spends the whole story alternately crushing weaklings underfoot and melting in adoration of strong men.

    It probably did Rand no harm that her books are flattering to economically successful white men.

    I read Atlas Shrugged when I was 15 years old, and enjoyed it, the same way I enjoyed When Worlds Collide at the same time, as a period science fiction piece. That age is just about right for a reader of the book. "Philosophy" aside, the novel is weak because it's about 550 pages too long and has almost no story. When Worlds Collide has actually stood the test of time better.
    i wonder if my understanding of books when i was 15 is the same as it is now that i'm a big boy.

    the book has no story?? 550 pages too long?

    'flattering to economically successful white men." yeah, it's time for me to go now.
    "He was nauseous with regret when he saw her face again, and when, as of yore, he pleaded and begged at her knees for the joy of her being. She understood Neal; she stroked his hair; she knew he was mad."
    ---Jack Kerouac, On The Road: The Original Scroll

  2. #122
    Banned earthboar's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    The Berkshire Hills, Massachusetts
    Posts
    87
    Blog Entries
    10

    The Fountainhead: Fun read, but top-heavy on ego

    Quote Originally Posted by cows View Post
    Hey,

    I'm in the middle of reading Atlas Shrugged. All I hear about Ayn Rand is that she is overrated and her philosophy is weak and so on. So far she seems like a decent fiction author. I might be missing something, so wheres the catch?

    Where do you stand? Most importantly why?
    I just picked up paperbacks of Atlas Shrugged and a 50th Anniversary edition of The Fountainhead.

    The Fountainhead is full of marketing junk, Ayn Rand philosophy, commentary, Ayn Rand reading lists, join the Ayn Rand philosophy club, etc. A real turn off.

    Like you, I find that she was a decent fiction writer. But, that's all. Not great, but the novel is so far decent. In her prologue and epilogue, Ayn Rand wrote about needing to formalize a philosophy in order to complete her book. I totally disagree, that's so disingenuous. Her philosophy seems little more than hedonism. Like anyone else, her world-view is a product of her upbringing. In Rand's case, she escaped the Russian Revolution and Soviet Communism. She approved of the U.S. model of capitalism--OK. Rand then grew up in the 30s, in an art deco period, when architectural influences were ubiquitous. Again, OK, so her thinking was shaped by the era. New and innovative she is not, however.

    I don't get the impression at all that she needed to create a new philosophical system (which is bogus, she did no such thing) to write her fine novel of industrial age ethics, which is as relevant today in corporate cubicles as ever.

    Everybody has a philosophy. It is so degrading, so "L. Ron Hubbard" when the artist tries to push their philosophy in commercial venues. Why couldn't she have been content to write fiction, and keep the sophistry insertions out of the pages of her novel? It's bad enough I find her romanticizing of her selfish heroes repugnant. They are good characters, but without great characterization.

    That's the main issue I have with this novel so far, that it's not the novel that troubles me but that Rand's agents indulged her spoiled but mediocre ego, encouraging her to believe she was a brilliant savant of social reform.

    Another thing I am discovering is how predictable the plot is. So far I have predicted everyone's next move with 100% accuracy.

    - Peter doesn't find Catherine at home. Where is she? At her Uncle Ellsworth Toohey's union rally, of course! Who didn't see that coming?
    - There's a character named David who marries his fiance Elaine. We see him sliding, missing work. By now we have a clear picture of what motivates Peter, so it's a no-brainer that his self-serving ambition means facilitating David's removal, ditto what happens to his firm's lead designer.

    Every step of the story is so formulaic, so transparent. There is no mystery, at least not yet. Still, I turn the page. The book is an easy read!

    A SparkNotes character synopsis describes Roarke this way: "Rand holds him up as everything that man can and should be. Consequently, Roark does not develop over the course of the novel—the ideal man does not need to change." That doesn't make for a very interesting lead man. Even Moses had temper tantrums and shook his fist at God now and again.
    Last edited by earthboar; 08-12-2007 at 08:28 PM. Reason: syntactic

  3. #123
    Bibliophile JBI's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    6,360
    This thread is somewhat silly in parts. How can you not grade her as a writer by viewing her philosophy. The writer is trying to push something, whether it be a story, and idea, or an image to the reader. In her case, her literature (we are talking about her fiction here) is used to peddle her philosophy.

    Personally, I would say her writing is as bad as her philosophy, thereby making her a bad writer, though I can see how if you resent one of these things, she is a bad writer.

    P.S. she was such a miserable woman.

  4. #124
    Banned earthboar's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    The Berkshire Hills, Massachusetts
    Posts
    87
    Blog Entries
    10

    the conundrum

    Quote Originally Posted by JBI View Post
    This thread is somewhat silly in parts. How can you not grade her as a writer by viewing her philosophy. The writer is trying to push something, whether it be a story, and idea, or an image to the reader. In her case, her literature (we are talking about her fiction here) is used to peddle her philosophy.

    Personally, I would say her writing is as bad as her philosophy, thereby making her a bad writer, though I can see how if you resent one of these things, she is a bad writer.
    Ignoring Rand's philosophy makes The Fountainhead an enjoyable read. Go figure.

  5. #125
    Registered User rich14285's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    50
    Blog Entries
    25

    Stand on Rand - critic by earthboar

    Thanks for your comments on Rand. You reminded me of the many times that I felt that I should read and enjoy the fountainhead and or atlas shrugged but alas, it was boring.

    Thanks again,

  6. #126
    writer
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    New York, NY
    Posts
    61
    Well, I didn't think this would get so many responses. I havent been on this forum in a while and its still got some recent posts. Very long story short, Rand is a repetitious writer who squeezes her philosophy through every crack in the plot. I still have to say her saving grace is the character development. Nothing spectacular though.

    Thanks for all the replies.

    Ryan
    "Writing is nothing more than a guided dream"
    -Jorge Luis Borges

  7. #127
    Banned earthboar's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    The Berkshire Hills, Massachusetts
    Posts
    87
    Blog Entries
    10

    Willing to discuss while I read Fountainhead

    Quote Originally Posted by cows View Post
    Rand is a repetitious writer who squeezes her philosophy through every crack in the plot. I still have to say her saving grace is the character development. Nothing spectacular though.

    Thanks for all the replies.

    Ryan
    Howard Roarke is utterly boring. Character development? There is none. As for Peter Keating, we've figured him out in the first 60 pages, when he's back-stabbing his way upward to become Francon's right-hand man. Here is a sample sequence of dialogue, from pages 130-131, where he is talking to his old friend Peter Keating (or, should I say, Keating is talking to an apathetic Roarke?) after Roarke opens his own office:

    Roarke's lines:
    "Who told you Peter?"
    "No, you don't have to."
    "Quite"
    "Probably"
    "Looks that way, doesn't it?"
    "I didn't"
    "No"
    "No, you wouldn't"
    "Thank you Peter"
    "Are you?"
    "I haven't thought of it."

    ...We get about two pages of that. Imaginative. Also, it is typical, and not the exception. There's a fine line between genius and idiot savant. From her prologue and self-aggrandizing lectures we get that Rand is trying to make Roarke out to be an ideal man, but it's hard to tell if she hasn't just idealized a retard who happens to draw well. Remember the kid in "Deliverance" who could play one hell of a banjo?

  8. #128
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    3
    Just thought I'd throw in my two cents...

    I've read The Fountainhead and Anthem by Ayn Rand and found them both thought-provoking and enjoyable. Yes, her philosophy is obvious, sometimes blatantly, throughout the books, but the books themselves are very good. And although people claim her philosophy is not perfect, who's is? I think many people are so vehemently against her because they cannot enjoy the fiction without feeling offended by her philosophy. Personally, I agree with many points in her philosophy and, therefore, renjoy the novels. That said, I agree that the advertisements included in some of the books to subscribe to the various Ayn Rand groups and mailing lists are very annoying.

  9. #129
    Banned earthboar's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    The Berkshire Hills, Massachusetts
    Posts
    87
    Blog Entries
    10
    Well, yeah, Ratroo, that is where I "stand on Rand" as well. I actually like her book, and I actually sympathize with some of her philosophy. It is not all bad, but it is not the greatest revelation since art deco, either. As a story writer, she is extremely readable. I don't think her philosophy is all that offensive, even understandable in the context of the period, when we were capitalizing and building on every resource available. I don't think she could get away with that kind of thinking in today's shrinking earth and sensitivity to social constraints. But, that is hardly cause to hate her for it. If she had never presented all that marketing material in her book, I would probably not realize there was this supposedly deep-rooted philosophical bent.
    Quote Originally Posted by Ratroo View Post
    Just thought I'd throw in my two cents...

    I've read The Fountainhead and Anthem by Ayn Rand and found them both thought-provoking and enjoyable. Yes, her philosophy is obvious, sometimes blatantly, throughout the books, but the books themselves are very good. And although people claim her philosophy is not perfect, who's is? I think many people are so vehemently against her because they cannot enjoy the fiction without feeling offended by her philosophy. Personally, I agree with many points in her philosophy and, therefore, renjoy the novels. That said, I agree that the advertisements included in some of the books to subscribe to the various Ayn Rand groups and mailing lists are very annoying.

  10. #130
    Circumcised Welder El Viejo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    176
    Blog Entries
    7

    Stand on Rand...

    I got interested in Rand after reading a WSJ article about two high-achieving brothers, one of whom had ditched the other because he didn't feel he was pulling his weight. This fellow said he had always known he wanted to be a 'trader,' and the WSJ explained that this was a reference to Rand, and made references to 'objectivism,' as justification for the fraternal split.

    So I read "Anthem," slogged part way through "The Virtue of Selfishness," but never got around to "Atlas Shrugged."

    Readability being in the eye of the beholder, I found "Anthem" to be an engaging story for the most part. Even mediocre writing and the occasional plot hole won't put me off a story if it's interesting enough. In the case of "Anthem" a couple of things made it nearly a toss-up.

    For instance, Equality decides that only worthwhile people have a place in the new world he is starting. The only people fit for membership are those like himself: curious seekers who fight and strive against everything that makes up the dark, totalitarian world he is escaping. But he makes two glaring exceptions. He decides he will rescue the man who does nothing more than cry in his bunk every night. He should despise this man, but inexplicably finds him worthy of saving. He will also bring the Golden One, who, apart from her adoration of Equality, seems incapable of anything but trying on clothes and gazing in mirrors.

    My disbelief also lost it's buoyancy at the idea that he could, with just a little tinkering, not only power up his Frank Lloyd Wright hilltop home, but also expect to defend it against all comers.

    Apart from that, I had a good time reading it. Equality in the dark, damp tunnels, writing, figuring out lightbulbs, exploring paths through the underground, taking his discoveries to the Council, fleeing their influence and discovering still more wonders in the wild.

    I think though, that if a story of a techno-warrior fighting the willfully ignorant is what you want, then Twain's "A Connecticut Yankee..." is a better choice. If it's overcoming totalitarian regimes that grabs you, then Levine's "This Perfect Day" might suit you better.

  11. #131
    Sometimes.. Igetanotion's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    38
    I went to a conference this past weekend where I met Frank McCourt (which was AWESOME) He had said that it was James Joyce's birthday, and my friend went up to him and said "Its also Ayn Rand's birthday!" He looked up at him, then back down and said "Aye... The fountainhead..." completely unimpressed. LoL just thought that would be funny to add
    "What makes people so impatient is what I can't figure; all the guy had to do was wait."- Cheif, One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest by Ken Kesey

  12. #132
    Our thoughts make spirals The Intended's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    22
    Anthem was terrible. It's been a while since I've read it, but I remember my main problem being with the omitting of the word 'I', but not 'you'. 'You' is just as individualizing; you can't have one without the other, and her whole sort of communistic society pivoted on the acceptance of man as not individuals but as a sole being. Therefore, everything should have been 'we', or 'our.' That threw me off throughout the book, and I couldn’t get past it.

    That being said, I'm about halfway through Atlas Shrugged and am enjoying it. Her philosophy is flawed but resonant in its belief that selfishness and want for profit fuel the world, and without it, we stagnate, which is true. But in the same sense, her ideas are overly simplistic, and exist in only the vacuum a novel can create: her philosophy depends completely on the virtue of men. Who was it that says 'Absolute power corrupts absolutely?' If her social-economic beliefs were to be applied realistically, we would have a great deal of Erons.

    I find her writing style quite engaging.
    I have seen the moment of my greatness flicker,
    And I have seen the Eternal Footman hold my coat, and snicker,
    And in short, I was afraid.
    -- "The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock", T. S. Eliot

    " 'Yes,' I said, as though carrying on a discussion, 'and amongst other things you dreamed foolishly of a certain butterfly. . .' "
    -- Lord Jim, Joseph Conrad

  13. #133
    Registered User Kent Edwins's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    N.J.
    Posts
    80

    Ayn Rand

    Yes, I know that lit majors are generally left leaning and we don't like Rand, regardless of whether we've read her or not. I realize that, without treading carefully, this thread will turn political. But, nonetheless, lately I've been reading Atlas Shrugged at the beckoning of someone very close to me and the promise of a corporate scholarship and, with all due respect, I want to discuss it.

    Who has read Rand? What does everyone think of Rand? Does she deserve a place in the halls of literature, or not?

    Atlas Shrugged has a theme. It is a theme that I disagree with, for the most part, but it is still a theme. Today, not many writers try to have themes in their work. I respect Rand's appreciation of classicism and form, which many modern writers deny to all ends.

    The book isn't particularly well written, but Rand wasn't writing in her native language. I guess that's something we all have to consider when reading it.

    The characters are hit or miss with me. Some, like Hank Rearden, are really interesting. Others are sad cardboard cut outs of the ideas Ayn Rand wanted

  14. #134
    The Poetic Warrior Dark Muse's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Within the winds
    Posts
    8,905
    Blog Entries
    964
    I love Rand, and though I have not read Atlas Shrugged yet, I have read The Fountainhead, and I thought it was fabulous. I know I am in the thin thin minority of acutally loving Rand's work, and further more agreeing with much of what she has to say. But I think she is fantastistic, and I do not find anything disagreeble in her philosophy, and The Fountainhead was truly amazing and sucked me right in from start to end.

    I cannot wait to read Atlas Shrugged. I look forward to it.

    Deep into that darkness peering, long I stood there, wondering, fearing, doubting, dreaming dreams no mortal ever dared to dream before. ~ Edgar Allan Poe

  15. #135
    biting writer
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    when it is not pc, philly
    Posts
    2,184
    My entire post was lost when these threads were merged, and I cannot repeat it word for word. Funny how that happens.

    However, let me try again: As a novel, I agree with Dark that The Fountainhead was a better read than not, but Atlas Shrugged takes Rand's second-rate intellectual reasoning and beats the reader over the head with it. Meritocracy is important, but Rand tries, and fails, to make it a 20th century martyrdom. No governing system we've ever devised is perfect, and that includes free market capitalism, and equality of opportunity is not relentless predation against the superior values of the entrepreneur--which is basically the argument Rand makes. As others have indicated, it is a simplistic idea, and Objectivism doesn't receive much traction in academia because it doesn't make much sense.

    Enforced egalitarianism has been a problem since Spartan society was in its heyday. Most reasonable thinkers agree here--but this is not the same thing as equal opportunity for all members in a society, allowing for the possibility of self-improvement. Rand was a rigid and closed minded thinker, and needs to be swallowed with a dose of caution.
    Last edited by Jozanny; 08-31-2008 at 06:33 AM. Reason: lost an i

Page 9 of 11 FirstFirst ... 4567891011 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Orwell and Rand
    By Craig J. Hawkins in forum 1984
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-22-2007, 08:17 AM
  2. ayn rand
    By Oddity123 in forum Book & Author Requests
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-24-2005, 04:18 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •