So maybe time would be better spent in learning historical details as opposed to applying 21st century morality to a 16th century work? Or even, daringly, to consider the quality of the writing.
That's fine. But when that 21st morality clouds or directs judgment, which it does, then I have a problem.None of which are mutually exclusive. Talking about the 16th century attitudes will inevitably bring about discussion of our own moral views.
You know for a fact that my thoughts were not directed at any particular poster or comment, but to the wider question. Of which I will direct elsewhere.I haven't heard one person on this thread claim we should condemn the work, but rather this is an integral part of understanding it and appreciating it on its own terms.