Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 26 of 26

Thread: The Art of War by Sun Tzu.

  1. #16
    Fingertips of Fury B-Mental's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    a rock on a beautiful mountain
    Posts
    4,569
    Blog Entries
    140
    Turk, I agree those people are foolish. They are however the ones that will kill me in my sleep for not buying their mp3 player...farewell sweet lit-net forum members.

    China has been in an untenable defensive position historically.
    "I am glad to learn my friend that you had not yet submitted yourself to any of the mouldy laws of Literature."
    -John Muir


    "My candle burns at both ends; It will not last the night; But ah, my foes, and oh, my friends - It gives a lovely light"
    -Edna St. Vincent Millay

  2. #17
    lunatic zen philosopher Triskele's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    here, monistically present
    Posts
    317
    hmmm... i agree with robin, the message is applicable in this modern age, but i think more for personal philosophy and religion (always fight with the Tao)... but i think that the concept that this book is for economics is i think taking it too far.

  3. #18
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    10
    it is, after all to paraphrase a Japanese proverb, " Business is war". after all
    they have so far been doing fine in this aspect, world domination?- think Sony,
    Panasonic, Toyota etc.

  4. #19
    lunatic zen philosopher Triskele's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    here, monistically present
    Posts
    317
    Quote Originally Posted by RobinHood3000 View Post
    But Sun Tzu states (albeit subtly - it appears in one sentence in Part III) that the best way to win a war is not to fight.

    All the same, I'm with Zippy - Sun Tzu wrote it as a manual, and its best use is as such, I believe. Aspects of The Art Of War are certainly applicable to everyday life, but others (like "always fight with a hillside to your right rear") aren't. For me, the book (though brief) read mostly like stereo instructions.
    i think that i was actually a very well written book, but seeing as that is pure opinion you can take it or leave it. Sun Tzu also said that it was wise to attack when you had the Tao. to me, these two references give the impression that war is necessary, but unneccesary war is evil, as JEB Stuart said "attack the fastest with the mostest" and so i hold my point, the idea is to attack swiftly and effectively with no unneccessary lives spared or killed.

  5. #20
    lunatic zen philosopher Triskele's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    here, monistically present
    Posts
    317
    Quote Originally Posted by B-Mental View Post
    Turk, I agree those people are foolish. They are however the ones that will kill me in my sleep for not buying their mp3 player...farewell sweet lit-net forum members.

    China has been in an untenable defensive position historically.

    actually that is quite untrue, thier isolation, and position against mountains and deserts respectively were what allowed Pax Sinica to exist, they have a good position for classical style warfare such as SunTzu wrote about

  6. #21
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    3
    I believe there is a book applying The Art of War and book of five rings to life principles. I've never gotten around to reading it and might atempt to now because of this discussion... it is rather short. It's The Book of Family Traditions on The Art of War by Yagyu Munenori.

    I might have this book pegged down completely wrong and it may be about multiple schools of The Art of War...however I got the impression that it is about Zen and Buddist principles applied to the way of the warrior.

    But this could be the key in this discussion about applying Sun Tzu's The Art of War to morality and life.
    Also on the Clausewitz On War being applied to life.

    I think On War was a much more precise book in its content rather than Sun Tzu's general applications. I've also wished that idiot resturant managers I've had in the past would take a few lessons from On War in organization and application. I can go into detail but its late and I don't feel like bringing out "the big guns". If y'all would like I certainly will but I feel it should be at a different time and possibly a different forum.
    Last edited by Venom; 01-30-2010 at 12:24 PM. Reason: Typo

  7. #22
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    3

    The Art of War in a modern context

    This is a great thread. Good posts.

    The 5 factors listed in chapter 1 relate well to a modern context. The commander being you or your side. Heaven and Earth being the external factors, while the moral law and method and discipline are the internal factors within your control.

    Heaven could be factors such as fashion trends, the weather outside, or the economy.

    Earth could be factors such as geography, roads, or laws.

    The Moral Law is what makes you and your allies believe you are doing the right thing. For Sun Tzu, it was the entire army believing that
    their cause was worth fighting for. For the individual, it is asking yourself for a gut check. Before entering conflict you should ask yourself: Do you believe you are right? Do you have a purpose? Do people agree with you?

    Method and Discipline is probably the most universal factor. It could also be called organization. For Sun Tzu it meant who could best supply troops and control expenses. For you it may refer to the strength of your work ethic or time management skills.

    I have written more for an e-book and online course I think you would like at www.learntheartofwar.com

    Check it out.

  8. #23
    The caffeinated newbie SFG75's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    139
    Blog Entries
    1
    I have to say that I agree largely with Bazarov. It is not uncommon to read certain books and see how it applies, could apply, or does not apply at all to one's situation in life. The opening lines of the book tell us of a universal reality;

    War is a matter of vital importance to the State;
    Granted, we can't apply his advice in a literal sense as none of us are commanders. However, there is "war" in every day life. The workplace, school, and politics are great examples of this. If you think you will get by in the workplace strictly due to being nice or super-competent, you are truly naive. Perhaps not every word written about terrain or promoting underlings will help you in your studies or at the workplace, but there is salient advice given when it comes to mindset and how to handle adversity.

  9. #24
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    The ol' abandoned warehouse
    Posts
    41
    Quote Originally Posted by chasestalling View Post
    i haven't read a word of sun tzu, but i know this: any endeavor devoid of tender regard for fellow man is bound for the scrap heap.
    I'm really trying to decide if you wrote that with sarcasm or not. If you did, you need a little work on your satirical bite. If you did not, then I envy your naivete.

  10. #25
    The caffeinated newbie SFG75's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    139
    Blog Entries
    1
    Excellent point Nick. Pharmaceutical medicines that cure or greatly aid health are done out of the profit motive, not necessarily a heart-rendering understanding of patience, thoug hI wouldn't deny that some folks provide money or engage in that line of work out of compassion. A selfishly motivated heart surgeon or executive provide helps to millions, and it is not out of a Mother Teresa like compassionate sincerity. I would argue that there isn't one overriding motivation for achievement and desire to help others.

  11. #26
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by David de Alba View Post
    I don't think 'The Art of War' was meant to be a moral guide in the strict sense that we attribute to morality in Western civilization, in this particular era. In my opinion, Sun Tzu summarized all his personal experience on tactics and strategy (and perhaps other people's experience, too) in order to write a concise, logical and solid military manual. Military history is one of my biggest personal interests, and I've seen that it is possible to adapt Sun Tzu's ideas to most historical battlefields and eras. Not only does 'The Art of War' deals with manoeuvers and tactics in the battlefield, it addresses everything a commander should take into account prior to engaging battle: logistics, intelligence, terrain, morale and last, but not least, the psychological understanding of the opponent. As I mentioned above, 'The Art of War' cannot be seen as guidance for the ethics and morality of our acts, nonetheless, it is a valuable instrument when it comes down to overcome daily life difficulties, it helps focus problems in such a way they can be solved systematically. And when it comes to use such knowledge against individuals, personal foes, it's important to keep on mind that it's best to beat an enemy without actually fighting; overkill is not the best outcome most of the times.
    I would argue that one cannot implement Sun Tzu's Art of War effectively without being benevolent.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •