Page 2 of 8 FirstFirst 1234567 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 118

Thread: School Dress Codes? Uniforms?

  1. #16
    somewhere else Helga's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    on the ice in the middle of the sea
    Posts
    2,382
    Blog Entries
    316
    in my sons playschool there are uniforms, both for the kids and the teacher. he is is a school with a different curriculum than others so it's the only one in iceland that has a uniform (at least to my knowledge) except one school for kids from 6-15. I like it, they are at a good price, they are comfortable for kids to play in and like the school says 'we are all playing for the same team' . if the parents of some kids can't afford the uniform the teacher has a few extra to let the child wear while he/she is in school. the schools logo is on it and it shows a girl and a boy with a small flower between them to show equal rights and and needs for each gender.

    I am all for it because I know of to many incidents where kids teased because of their clothes and what kids want to wear these days is way way more expensive than the uniform. I remember a girl who was teased a lot because her mom bought her clothes in a shop that wasn't as cool and expensive as the 'cool' kids clothes. my sons niece isn't an a equal part in her soccer team because she hasn't the right Adidas pants, the don't pass the ball to her and try and push her out of the game. this is not right and there are so many incidents like that all because of the clothes kids wear to school each day.
    I hope death is joyful, and I hope I'll never return -Frida Khalo

    If I seem insensitive to what you are going through, understand it's the way I am- Mr. Spock

    Personally, I think that the unique and supreme delight lies in the certainty of doing 'evil'–and men and women know from birth that all pleasure lies in evil. - Baudelaire

  2. #17
    Southern Comfort papayahed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    15,809
    Quote Originally Posted by TheFifthElement View Post
    As far as I see it uniforms in school are at best about creating a professional image and at worst a visual demonstration of obedience. It is all very well to say it 'does no harm', but I think we ought to really be asking the question 'does it do any good'? I can think of no good practical application for them in school which is not the case when considering uniforms in employment situations. Perhaps I am missing something? If so, please someone tell me what it is.

    Seriously, what's wrong with a visual demonstration of obedience? You make it sound like the kids are being "broken" by putting them in uniforms.

    There are several good practical reasons for them in school:
    1) Cheaper, I had to purchase 2 skirts, ~10 blouses, 2 pairs of shoes for four years of school. I could have made it with one skirt but I took out some threads and the skirt became too short.
    2) Easier to enforce a dress code.
    3) Easier to decide what to wear each morning.
    4) Easier to get students to submit to subcutaneous implants to track their thoughts and movement.
    Last edited by papayahed; 03-19-2010 at 07:45 AM.
    Do, or do not. There is no try. - Yoda


  3. #18
    Internal nebulae TheFifthElement's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    2,901
    Blog Entries
    175
    Quote Originally Posted by papayahed View Post
    Seriously, what's wrong with a visual demonstration of obedience?
    What's right with it?

    There are several good practical reasons for them in school:
    1) Cheaper, I had to purchase 2 skirts, ~10 blouses, 2 pairs of shoes for four years of school. I could have made it with one skirt but I took out some threads and the skirt became too short.
    it's not necessarily cheaper. I commented on this earlier. See post 8.
    2) Easier to enforce a dress code.
    why is this 'practical'?

    3) Easier to decide what to wear each morning.
    why is this 'good'?
    4) Easier to get students to submit to subcutaneous implants to track their thoughts and movement.
    yes. Very practical.

    Quote Originally Posted by papayahed View Post
    You make it sound like the kids are being "broken" by putting them in uniforms.
    No, that wasn't my point. I'm not concerned about individuality here. What I'm more concerned about is that a decision is taken that school uniforms are somehow 'necessary'. This is a positive decision around which school have a policy and which is enforced. This takes time and diverts resource and attention. Kids who are otherwise good students get into trouble because their shirt's come untucked. In some areas uniform policies are enforced without recourse to logic or sense, see post 8 again for an example of this. My question is, if it doesn't make you a better student what is it really there for? It's not there for safety purposes. It doesn't aid learning. It doesn't stop bullying or stop everyone from telling who the poor or neglected kids are and it doesn't prevent sexualisation. People have proven themselves perfectly capable of being good, dedicated, respectful students without needing a uniform. So why have it?
    Last edited by TheFifthElement; 03-19-2010 at 08:46 AM.
    It's the sparkle you become when you conquer anxiety

    Currently reading: The Pillow Book by Sei Shonagon and Silent Spring by Rachel Carson

  4. #19
    Quote Originally Posted by papayahed View Post
    4) Easier to get students to submit to subcutaneous implants to track their thoughts and movement.
    I like this one. Now if only it were true, maybe I would worry less about my kids when they're teens

  5. #20
    Registered User Emil Miller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    London, England
    Posts
    5,510
    I wore school uniform as it's pretty much de rig. in England but it didn't bother me at all. My one refraction was to wear gaudily patterned ties when I got into the 6th form. I don't think school uniform makes a great deal of difference to a person's education except, perhaps, to teach children that the world doesn't revolve exclusively around them. However, even in enforced uniformity, some childrern will be smarter than others. Like most of the school I wasn't particularly tidy but there was one kid called Waldemeyer who looked amazingly suave and sophisticated in his blazer and flannels: a sort of cross between Anton Walbrook and Cary grant. He made even the teachers look scruffy.

  6. #21
    Pirate! Katy North's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    321
    Blog Entries
    1
    I think the argument of is it cheaper or not depends on whether your child is materialistic or not. It sounds like these uniforms aren't cheap as opposed to shopping at K-Mart, but definitely cheaper than a trip to Abercrombie and Fitch at the Mall...
    Hope is that thing with feathers that perches in the soul and sings the tune without the words and never stops... at all. ~Emily Dickinson

    I ask not for a lighter burden, but for broader shoulders. ~Jewish Proverb

  7. #22
    Jethro BienvenuJDC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Mid-Pennsylvania, USA
    Posts
    13,840
    Blog Entries
    10
    I would have to agree with papayahed completely here.

    Quote Originally Posted by TheFifthElement View Post
    This is a positive decision around which school have a policy and which is enforced. This takes time and diverts resource and attention. Kids who are otherwise good students get into trouble because their shirt's come untucked. In some areas uniform policies are enforced without recourse to logic or sense, see post 8 again for an example of this.
    This has nothing to do with Uniform Dress Code, and everything to do with HOW it is enforced. Attention could also likely be diverted and time taken to enforce non-uniform dress codes to the same ridiculous standards if an administration so chose to. Just because someone could go overboard in the implementation of the code, does not make the dress code bad.


    My question is, if it doesn't make you a better student what is it really there for? It's not there for safety purposes. It doesn't aid learning. It doesn't stop bullying or stop everyone from telling who the poor or neglected kids are and it doesn't prevent sexualisation. People have proven themselves perfectly capable of being good, dedicated, respectful students without needing a uniform. So why have it?
    I don't think that it has been documented that school uniforms do not at least AID in a better learning environment. There are those who have thrown around their own ideas about it. But just because someone SAYS that uniforms don't aid in improving the learning environment, it does not make it so.

    According to my own opinion, I feel that uniforms WOULD make better students (even if it is just slightly). I feel that it would create less distraction and sexualization (again, even if just slightly).

    I checked a couple of studies, and the results seem to indicate that there is no major effect, but maybe a slight improvement. However, social aspects are very difficult to measure. The studies only seemed to measure test scores, absenteeism, etc. These aspects are much more greatly effect by other influences, such as parental involvement and even cultural aspects. To say that there is NO GOOD from uniform policies is saying too much.
    Les Miserables,
    Volume 1, Fifth Book, Chapter 3
    Remember this, my friends: there are no such things as bad plants or bad men. There are only bad cultivators.

  8. #23
    Philologist Nietzsche's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Boiling Springs, SC
    Posts
    156
    I don't care much for anything which suppresses the individual. Though, I can't say there are no benefits from uniforms, because there are, but i'm rather glad I didn't have to wear one. A middle ground in my opinion would be a set of several outfits that you can choose from.
    "I teach you the Übermensch. Man is something that shall be overcome. What have you done to overcome him? … What is ape to man? A laughing stock or painful embarrassment. And man shall be that to the Übermensch" -- from Thus Spoke Zarathustra by Nietzsche

    “Let the future tell the truth, and evaluate each one according to his work and accomplishments. The present is theirs; the future, for which I have really worked, is mine.” - Nikola Tesla

  9. #24
    Jethro BienvenuJDC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Mid-Pennsylvania, USA
    Posts
    13,840
    Blog Entries
    10
    Quote Originally Posted by Nietzsche View Post
    I don't care much for anything which suppresses the individual. Though, I can't say there are no benefits from uniforms, because there are, but i'm rather glad I didn't have to wear one. A middle ground in my opinion would be a set of several outfits that you can choose from.
    A very reasonable stance...thank you for such an honest consideration...
    Les Miserables,
    Volume 1, Fifth Book, Chapter 3
    Remember this, my friends: there are no such things as bad plants or bad men. There are only bad cultivators.

  10. #25
    Quote Originally Posted by Nietzsche View Post
    A middle ground in my opinion would be a set of several outfits that you can choose from.
    There are several outfits in the uniform that you can choose from. Golf shirt (long sleeve or short sleeve), dress shirt (long sleeve or short sleeve), sweater, vest, sweatshirt, etc.

    My only complaint is that the uniforms are expensive. My school eliminated white golf shirts, probably because it didn't want students to buy them from cheaper places like Old Navy.
    The world is waiting for you - Phil Keoghan

  11. #26
    Orwellian The Atheist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    The George Orwell sub-forum
    Posts
    4,150
    Quote Originally Posted by The Comedian View Post
    And I think serious cat would approve of them (waves to Serious cat) because they would help create a more studious atmosphere in general (but by no means create one).
    It's so hard to be sure. It should be relatively easy to explore by looking at the pass rate of similar socio-economically grouped schools with different uniform codes, but it doesn't quite work like that.

    You probably couldn't do it here or in UK, because uniforms are the norm and only the "liberal" schools have no uniform rules and the liberalism tends to contain a disdain for pass marks as well.

    I can report that the two schools voted as the worst in Auckland were two without uniforms. They both changed management and introduced uniforms and now rate among the best. One of them rated #1 in the country. It certainly isn't any kind of evidence because the uniforms came as part of massive changes in culture and teaching methods which are a lot more likely to matter.

    Quote Originally Posted by MarkBastable View Post
    At my school it was whipping for a first offence, followed by an escalation of punishments for subsequent transgressions that culminated in the public crucifixion of incorrigible non-tuckers-in-of-shirts.
    Those Catholic schools are hell on that, eh? Every single one I've been in has a bloke nailed to the wall without a uniform.

    Quote Originally Posted by Katy North View Post
    I think the argument of is it cheaper or not depends on whether your child is materialistic or not. It sounds like these uniforms aren't cheap as opposed to shopping at K-Mart, but definitely cheaper than a trip to Abercrombie and Fitch at the Mall...
    It also depends on the uniform.

    Primary school uniforms can vary between $50 a set at a lower decile school - polo shirt and tracksuit pants - to $200 at a higher decile one.

    I'd be a lot more in favour of uniforms if schools tried to minimise the cost by using cheaper, but effective, options.
    Go to work, get married, have some kids, pay your taxes, pay your bills, watch your tv, follow fashion, act normal, obey the law and repeat after me: "I am free."

    Anon

  12. #27
    Overlord of Cupcak3s 1n50mn14's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Strawberry fields
    Posts
    928
    Blog Entries
    13
    Ditto EVERYTHING TheFifthElement said. Once again, you have put into words how I feel much more eloquently than I ever could.
    Naked except for a cigarette, you let your mind drift and forget your disbelief. Feel the chill down your back and the flutter of wings through dandelion fields, and forget the pull of gravity in a night without stars.

    I lack eloquence and commitment to my arguments. They are half baked, and I will begin passionately, and then abandon them.

  13. #28
    Jethro BienvenuJDC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Mid-Pennsylvania, USA
    Posts
    13,840
    Blog Entries
    10
    Quote Originally Posted by AmericanEagle View Post
    because it didn't want students to buy them from cheaper places like Old Navy.
    Does.........AmericanEagle...carry them?
    Les Miserables,
    Volume 1, Fifth Book, Chapter 3
    Remember this, my friends: there are no such things as bad plants or bad men. There are only bad cultivators.

  14. #29
    Quote Originally Posted by BienvenuJDC View Post
    Does.........AmericanEagle...carry them?
    Yes, American Eagle carries them, but most of their golf shirts have an eagle logo on them, so you can't really pass them off as a school uniform.
    The world is waiting for you - Phil Keoghan

  15. #30
    Livin' in Slow Motion Hurricane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    East Coast, Beast Coast.
    Posts
    512
    I attended a middle/high school with a dress code (and attend a college with uniforms..), and honestly it was pretty nice. My dress code dictated no jeans, sweatpants, large logos, overly short skirts, etc. Everybody looked presentable and relatively professional. Though obviously there still were cliques and different groups, but clothes weren't as much of an issue. My school may have been unusual, but people were divided more into drinkers/non-drinkers than stuff based off of outward appearance. Uniforms would have probably made it even better. Dress codes/uniforms for all wouldn't mean that students would just sit around holding hands, but it makes one less point of contention.

    As far as I see it uniforms in school are at best about creating a professional image and at worst a visual demonstration of obedience. It is all very well to say it 'does no harm', but I think we ought to really be asking the question 'does it do any good'? I can think of no good practical application for them in school which is not the case when considering uniforms in employment situations. Perhaps I am missing something? If so, please someone tell me what it is.
    What's wrong with a "visual demonstration of obedience"? Even showing up at school is in some ways a demonstration of obedience. The students have to obey and respect the teacher, it's the only way school works. When they get real jobs, a lot of students are going to have to abide by a dress code (shirt &tie/suit/whatever) and I think that good comes from getting people used to that.
    Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot, nothing is going to get better, it's not.

Page 2 of 8 FirstFirst 1234567 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Should school be compulsory?
    By SleepyWitch in forum Serious Discussions
    Replies: 43
    Last Post: 07-19-2012, 06:42 AM
  2. One Last Kiss
    By 1_winged_angel in forum General Writing
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 02-14-2009, 06:41 PM
  3. W. E. Cule
    By arcturus in forum General Literature
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 12-05-2007, 11:32 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •