Notice how character development is only 1 portion of how I consider a novel. I merely cited Pride and Prejudice to show that, while not as satirical as Candide, it achieves a greater level of practically everything component of my literary criteria. I love how you zoned in on only one dimension, however. Beautiful.
To all who read my posts though, I do not criticize "classics" for the sake of iconoclasm. When I formed my initial judgments of each novel I read, I analyzed and considered each novel seriously, as I had read most of these novels up to a year before I even joined this forum, giving me time to formulate my thoughts. I posted why I found them disappointing, as evidenced by my earlier posts.
Regardless of whether or not you disagree with my perspectives on these works, it is merely my opinion. If you choose to question them, do so. But when I am referred to as, "grossly ignorant," or, "sneer" at anything required a concerted effort, I take offence and find it necessary to defend my opinions.
Notice, I said, opinions. I expect many people to disagree with my thoughts. Just understand that I was voicing my findings, not purposely intending to be controversial.