Wow, PeterL, is that your preferred definition of goodness, or are you just throwing it out there to make the point about how there can be flexibility/variation in how we might define goodness?
I would consider it bad if someone who's ready to accept rape as a valid method for spreading genes were able to spread them by that method. Same for one who prefers to define goodness in terms of the interests of a particular gene over those of a particular individual person.