Well the tile of the thread says it all... I read Doctor Zhivago, I finally got to see the movie, which i was curious about, so I wonder if there's someone who wants to discuss it.
I enjoyed both the book and the movie. At first I was a bit disappointed in the movie cos I was waiting for everything to be exactly like in the book, but it wasnt...of course I know it's not meant to be the same, but I can't help having such expectation.
It seems to me that in the movie Lara was more involved with Komarovsky than in the book...In the book she's sort of attracted to him but she despises him a lot too, in the film she seems more to be pretending to despise him... I didn't like Lara much in the movie, especially in the first part. Even in the book, she wasn't my favourite because she is so perfect...and I hate figures of perfect women. Though i didnt manage to hate Lara, cos she was portrayed very well (in the book), but still too perfect to me. Yes, i preferred Tonya, she felt more real to me (even if my mum made me notice that she was 'betrayed and happy with it'...). It felt in a way like the eternal fight between the good, blck-haired woman, and the perfect blonde one, which the other can't equal no matter what. Maybe in the film even more, after all blonde in the 60s was considered close to perfection, if I'm not wrong.
And in this cases, I can't help being on the 'loser's side (and especially, not on the blonde's side). Btw, I was wondering... does the book describe Tonya as black-haired and Lara as blonde? I guess so, cos that's how I expected them to be...
Talking of appearances, I would have liked Zhivago to look different in the movie, just because in my imagination he was different...more feminine in a way, I guess even his appearance should have looked 'sensitive' to me.
I think that the character that came out better in the movie was that of Antipov-Strelnikov. Again i don't particularly agree with the look, but he expressed such strength...Even if again, in the book he was deeper I think, his choices had a deeper explanation. But the movie seems to sum up a lot. I actually think in this case the expectations from the book spoiled the movie for me a bit, cos it feels much more superficial and simplistic compared to the book...but of course, if it had followed it literally it would be at least 6 hours long...
Any more thoughts for discussion? I'd like to comment more on the book, but I need some input as I have the movie's impressions first in my mind now...And the book is a vast material for discussion. I read it in a long time, sometimes not touching it for a few weeks, and dspite this I never got realyl lost, even if the plot wasn't the simplest, especially at the beginning. There is some detai that got lost in this process but I'm surprised I didnt have to start it again at some point as i feared..