Have you not been paying attention to my posts? I've never set out to "debunk" evolution because, frankly, I can't. That doesn't hurt me to say, because the other side of the coin is you can't "debunk" my belief either: both are equally unprovable. I have simply asked the evolutionists to acknowledge the role that faith, uncertainty, and interpretation play out in evolution as well as creationism (which few evolutionists seem willing to do). You keep claiming "straw man" but you have not explained how I'm using such a tactic. Where am I setting up a weaker argument instead of dealing with the one at hand? Identify what it is you keep claiming to be victimized by.