Originally Posted by
NickAdams
Sorry about the delay, but this was the week of my finals.
I like this, but Ty Mcleod's background should be worked into the body of your story. The rest works well, in giving the reader context.
Ty Mcleod read in the "Dearborn Independent" (Henry Ford´s newspaper) that driven by the growth of the automobile industry, total U.S. pipeline mileage grew to over 115,000 miles. Most of it sprawling across the West.
I replaced he with Ty Mcleod, so you can get an idea of what I mean, but I would edit it again.
Dickz makes a valid point. Writing sbout a time period that's not your ow is tricky. I don't know if Ty would have said faggot, or asked the question of pumps (if the Morgan brothers were even able to afford more than one), or if fingerprints were that important in crime detection.
I mentioned Joh Gardner on your other thread and I think it is more relevent now. In Becoming a Novelist he says that a writer has to learn to see. We watch television and read books and when we write, our dialogue and description read like books and shows. It becomes twice removed. It's like the cartoonist who learns anatomy from other artist. We have to go to the source. I like the frame of your dialogue, but I think you have to go to the source. A great excercise is going to any place where there's people and listen. Write some of their dialogue down in a note pad. Get a feel for their speech, their choice of words, and what they talk about ... and how the talk around issues.
True: a story doesn't have to be graphic to be entertaining, but this is Gordon Gecko's America and the violence is expressing the idea.
At the moment this is a sketch and to make it a story, there needs to be a character arch. The intro suggest that Ty is the central character, but he doesn't change and I don't expect him to. But, somebody needs to react to what's going on in a way that changes them. Morty seems like a good canidate. We have Ty and Dusty, two stones. They aren;t going to change. But, Morty. He cautious. He doesn't want trouble. He's no a cynic like his brother. Maybe this event changes him. Maybe he should be left alive, so when Ty drives off, the reader can see the severity of this situation.
All you characters are flat. Morty should be rounded out. Maybe the read should spend more time with Morty and Dusty, before Ty comes in. The potential I see in Morty is guilt. He didn't back his brother's skepticism and allowed Ty to much leg room and as a result he might feel responsible for Dusty's death.
I'm suprised if your symbolism is unintentional, even though it's usual the case.
The theme I get from your work so far is anarchy of the young. The decay of generations. Old agaisnt young. Your introduction, speaks of growth of industry. The spread of modern. Ty is young and reckless he should know he won't live long. When he kills Dusty he denies himself a future. Not only will he be hunted but he will be sent to death. Ty is a modern man who doesn't want to become the old generation. The is echoed when the shot rings out into the distance, the past. The mob is full of older men and tradition and he is running from it.
Morty and Dusty are opposites. Dusty and Ty are similiar. Ty does kill his older self.
There is conflict between Morty and Dusty. Ty and Dusty. Morty and Ty. Explore that.
Figure out who Morty is. What was it like for Morty to grow up with Dusty. You only have to figure out two characters. Morty and Dusty, because when you find Dusty you will have found Ty.
Maybe Dusty was like Ty when he was young, but Morty saved him from that life, but the life still caught up with him.
The frame of the story is great. It just has to be explored. You finished the hardest part. You have all the pieces; it's just a matter of expanding.
The only thing left is how you tag your dialogue. Get rid of the adjectives. The dialogue should set the tone.
I have a character questionnaire. I can pm it to you, if you want it. It's a good way to explore the character.