Seeking truth is all we aspire to no matter which disciplines of learning we take to, science or art or philosophy.
More than any professionals or disciplinarians writers are more engagingly devoted to this, the search for truth. Whether they are engaging themselves in exploring things through tracks of science or wallowing in spirituality all seek for truth. Truth is something which is never achievable, for there are levels or layers of truth. Once we reach one layer, another surfaces and this goes endlessly and infinitely.
I read Tolstoy and he was so obsessed with truth. He wrote the masterpiece war and peace that tries to explore into the domain of truth, and later on he took on nonfictional essays wherein he was so obsessed with the question of truth.
Writers or philosophers from Dante to Russel and the rest of all were so occupied by it that they are mirrors in which we see fragments of truths. We cannot see all truths in any treatises.
Everyone, every human, we do not about animals wonders at himself and at the creation he sees. hardly any one lives on earth who does not want to know about the mystery of death.
Writers in a way nearer to the domain of truth than any other professionals, for literature and philosophies give refinements or subtleties.
Wherein do we find writers are different than the rest? Writing is a tradition and evolution, and every succeeding writer is more refined and subtle in his or her expression. Now if anyone takes to the course of philosophy he crams everything starting from Plato through Nietzsche to Russel, to postmodern philosophers. Unquestionably his ideas will be deeper and more logical and scientific than his predecessors. I never mean he succeeds in excelling them and no but in general he does not tend to repeat the flaws his predecessors have committed
To arrive at truth we read the Bible, the Gita, the Koran, the Dhammaopada and the rest of sacred stuff. That validates the point that writers are more sublimes beings and they see subtler truths and sail across domains generally not visualized or seen by doctrinaire.
Writing is really a challenging thing and to do one has to master himself in putting ideas equipping himself with logics and must develop the art of expression.
Writers who can give philosophical quotients in his writings are really immortal than those who are simply swept by the gush of imagination. If imagination is combined with philosophy the piece of writing at his disposal will be impeccable.
Writing is really a big challenge, for through writings alone people can go across or share ideas with millions at the same time in this age of developed print medias and electronic medias.
For instance I am enabled to share my ideas across people of different worlds and across different ages and genres of interests.
That there is no question that my domains of knowledge can expand through literature is a fact.