Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Time, Society and Nature

  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    paris' suburb
    Posts
    1

    Time, Society and Nature

    Hi there,
    Is someone can try to help me on the subject Time, Society and Nature on the book Tess of the D'Ubervilles? What do you think?

  2. #2
    Hippie toni's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Manila
    Posts
    4,365
    Blog Entries
    1

    which part?

    Can you state exactly which part of the book is that?

  3. #3
    Registered User kelby_lake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    3,620
    6 years on but this would still make a very interesting discussion for anyone willing to participate.

    For me, Time and Nature are the ruling forces in Hardy's novels. The characters are constricted by social forces and yet they were clearly born to operate outside of society. Nevertheless they play by society's rules and normally suffer for it. That's why Hardy is one of the greatest novelists of all time- because his characters are not merely social outcasts; they were made for a better society than this. Unfortunately they are ahead of their time and are consequently punished.

    I say ahead of their time but what I really mean is that they are primal.

  4. #4
    Registered User kev67's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Reading, England
    Posts
    2,458
    I can see there is a lot of nature in Tess of the d'Urbervilles. They do after all live in the countryside (Hmm, I wonder if livestock and crops count as nature). I read some student notes which argued something along the lines of Tess representing nature while Angel represents culture (or did I dream it?) I can see there is society too: peasants like Tess and her friends and family, and the middle class like Angel and Alec and their families. I cannot see where time fits in. I suppose it's a snapshot of a society at a certain place and time. Social attitudes, religious attitudes, mechanisation and education all seemed to be evolving quite rapidly in the late 1800s. It seems a long time since Dickens, as were the other late Victorian writers I have read, Conrad and Gissing. Does this era represent the start of "modernity"?
    According to Aldous Huxley, D.H. Lawrence once said that Balzac was 'a gigantic dwarf', and in a sense the same is true of Dickens.
    Charles Dickens, by George Orwell

  5. #5
    Registered User kelby_lake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    3,620
    I think Time is important in Tess of the D'Urbevilles. The past features very heavily in Hardy's work.

Similar Threads

  1. Industrial Society Destroys Mind and Environment
    By sushil_yadav in forum Philosophical Literature
    Replies: 213
    Last Post: 12-09-2016, 08:33 PM
  2. A Truly Atheist Society
    By Sitaram in forum Religious Texts
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 10-02-2008, 04:26 PM
  3. GREAT GREAT GREAT BOOK EVA
    By JEN in forum Pride and Prejudice
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 06-21-2008, 07:38 AM
  4. Crusoe
    By Unregistered in forum Robinson Crusoe
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12-05-2007, 08:08 AM
  5. 1984 and Brave New World
    By Vassoul in forum A Brave New World
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 01-25-2005, 09:28 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •