Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 24

Thread: Is John Donne’s poetry sexist?

  1. #1

    Is John Donne’s poetry sexist?

    Here is a selection of lines from Donne’s poetry. Given that he has the reputation of being one of the literary world’s great love poets, my question is, ‘does he express offensively sexist attitudes?'. Even if he isn’t ‘serious’, is this acceptable to our better-informed modern age? Should his work be banned from examination syllabuses?

    “Hope not for mind in women ; at their best,
    Sweetness and wit they are, but mummy, possess'd.”
    from Loves Alchemy

    Here Donne is saying that there is no point in expecting to find intelligence in women. The best you can hope for is “Sweetness and wit” but once you’ve ‘had them’ (I think that’s the expression), they are merely dead shells.


    Now thou hast loved me one whole day,
    To-morrow when thou leavest, what wilt thou say?
    From Woman’s Constancy

    The implication here is that woman can’t be faithful for more than a day.

    I can love both fair and brown;
    Her whom abundance melts, and her whom want betrays;
    Her who loves loneness best, and her who masks and plays;
    Her whom the country form'd, and whom the town;
    Her who believes, and her who tries;
    Her who still weeps with spongy eyes,
    And her who is dry cork, and never cries.
    I can love her, and her, and you, and you;
    I can love any, so she be not true.
    from The Indifferent

    Here Donne lumps women into a series of simple categories according to things like hair colour and body shape. How demeaning!

    The venom of all stepdames, gamesters' gall,
    What tyrants and their subjects interwish,
    What plants, mine, beasts, fowl, fish,
    Can contribute, all ill, which all
    Prophets or poets spake, and all which shall
    Be annex'd in schedules unto this by me,
    Fall on that man; For if it be a she
    Nature beforehand hath out-cursèd me.
    From The Curse

    Now this is really nasty. He is saying that his curses, however vicious, cannot match the curse of being a woman.

    When my grave is broke up again
    Some second guest to entertain,
    For graves have learn'd that woman-head,
    To be to more than one a bed—
    from The Relic

    Here he is saying that infidelity is a common female characteristic. How dare he make such negative generalisations!

    What I will say, I will not tell thee now,
    Lest that preserve thee; and since my love is spent,
    I'd rather thou shouldst painfully repent,
    Than by my threatenings rest still innocent.
    from The Apparition

    This is also rather nasty. The word ‘spent’ carries overtones of having had an orgasm. He is hoping the woman doesn’t repent because, having used her sexually, he would prefer to see her suffer than be contrite.

    Licence my roving hands, and let them go
    Before, behind, between, above, below.
    O, my America, my Newfoundland,
    My kingdom, safest when with one man mann'd,

    Here, he is comparing women to countries and suggesting that women are ‘safest’ when ruled by just one man. He also sounds like a molester.

    and

    Like pictures, or like books' gay coverings made
    For laymen, are all women thus array'd.
    Themselves are only mystic books, which we
    —Whom their imputed grace will dignify—
    Must see reveal'd.
    from Elegy XX. To His Mistress Going To Bed

    Here, he is comparing women to book covers! How sexist! He is also suggesting that ‘we’ need to see them naked. Does Johnny Donne not realise that there’s more to a woman than naked flesh?


    If thou be'st born to strange sights,
    Things invisible to see,
    Ride ten thousand days and nights,
    Till age snow white hairs on thee,
    Thou, when thou return'st, wilt tell me,
    All strange wonders that befell thee,
    And swear,
    No where
    Lives a woman true and fair.

    If thou find'st one, let me know,
    Such a pilgrimage were sweet;
    Yet do not, I would not go,
    Though at next door we might meet,
    Though she were true, when you met her,
    And last, till you write your letter,
    Yet she
    Will be
    False, ere I come, to two, or three.
    from Song (Go and catch a falling star)

    These lines suggest that there is no such thing as an attractive faithful woman. I think he is also implying that faithful women are only faithful if they are ugly because then men won’t want them. He then changes it a bit to saying that even if you could find an attractive faithful woman, by the time you have told someone, she will have been unfaithful with two or three men.

    Taken together, these comments seem like a damning indictment of women. Should such sexist propaganda be venerated as great Literature? Isn’t it merely legitimising hostility to women by including material like this on examination syllabuses?

    Yours,
    Outraged of Camden

  2. #2
    Procrastinator
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Good Old Albion
    Posts
    167
    Yesterday when I decided to revise for my exams by reading poetry and thinking about how I would analyse it you posted on exactly that and now today when I decide to focus specifically on Donne (and particularly on how he porteays women) I come across this post! You haven't also posted anything on Browning and his portrayal of women somewhere by any chance?

    Well obviously since I have decided to write about Donne in my exam I don't think Donne's poetry should be taken off exam syllabuses. Even if he is sexist. These views were widely held at the time and if we decided to get rid of everthing that is not now 'PC' from syllabuses we'd end up with a fairly slim choice!

  3. #3
    Procrastinator
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Good Old Albion
    Posts
    167
    I just realised that I didn't get round to saying whether I even thought Donne was sexist in my last post. My answer is that I don't think so. How seriously are we supposed to take the poems in which he says these things? Isn't he just showing the absurdity of the way women were portrayed at the time? What about his poetry that shows a better portrayal of women?

  4. #4
    I think he was probably sexist but didn't realize maybe since the world at large in my opinion was anyway. It was normal,by and large not malicious.

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lady
    Browning and his portrayal of women somewhere by any chance?
    Sorry, I don’t like Browning, although My Last Duchess is worth reading and interesting from this perspective.


    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lady
    How seriously are we supposed to take the poems in which he says these things?
    How seriously are we supposed to take Outraged of Camden?

    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lady
    Isn't he just showing the absurdity of the way women were portrayed at the time?
    I’m not sure about this. Is he really holding it up as absurd or is his emphasis elsewhere? He seems to be enjoying it far too much to be simply making fun of it. I have taught students who complain that his humour, though witty and ingenious, does patronise women. They ask me if he had ‘been’ racist instead of sexist, would we still admire him. I order them to shut up and believe what I tell them.

    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lady
    What about his poetry that shows a better portrayal of women?
    Indeed – I agree – it’s easy to pick out particular comments and misrepresent the whole but the whole is just too much for some people.

    PS Someone has sent me a PM to complain of my use of 'syllabuses'. This is the problem with ‘correct usage’ – you can’t win. ‘Syllabuses’ has been given official status as the acceptable plural and using ‘syllabi’ is now reckoned to be rather pedantic and pompous. As I say, either way you are damned – pedantic or incorrect. I used it here because the UK and international examination boards use ‘syllabuses’.

    Thanks to the person who sent the PM - I hope you aren’t too disappointed that I did know the difference.

    Does anyone have an example of my misuse of the semi-colon anywhere?

  6. #6
    nope, you don't make mistakes dear Unnameable. That is why I look up to you-always.

  7. #7
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    10
    hi unnamable, though u r right that there is something vulgar about women in donne'poetry but on the other hand, he tellls us about the depth of love and fidelity of his beloved. i will give u an instance from "the releque" when he says, "thou shalt be a Mary Magdalen, and I a something else thereby" on the whole, i will say, he is a great poet of english literature

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by The Unnamable
    Does anyone have an example of my misuse of the semi-colon anywhere?
    I'm sure I can find something.

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by The Unnamable
    Taken together, these comments seem like a damning indictment of women. Should such sexist propaganda be venerated as great Literature? Isn’t it merely legitimising hostility to women by including material like this on examination syllabuses?

    Yours,
    Outraged of Camden
    Forgive me for not having elaborated upon my opinion before, but, as you may know, my plate - has been rather fuller than usual these last few days. The demands upon one’s time are great and one’s capacities finite. In any case, now that the aforementioned plate has been safely gotten out of harm’s way, I am here to give your questions my fullest attention.

    Venerated as great Literature? Banned, Sir, I say it should be banned!

    This is blasphemy against the good name of woman. How dare any man commit this sacrilege? How can we force ourselves to permit such ideas to exist in another’s mind in this day and age? Do we not have even a scrap of conscience within us? Do we?! We are all aware of the decades of effort made by feminists like Wollstonecraft to the end of freeing society of precisely such notions of womanhood. Are we to let all that effort be reduced to nothing, are we to allow such blatantly sexist and politically incorrect matter to remain in circulation today, and as if that were not enough – (gasp!) allow it to be taught to our children? Are we to permit the proliferation of such ideas of the objectification of women and the treatment of them as mere sources of pleasure when years of reform have gone into making society even as liberal as it is today on the question of women’s rights?

    We cannot, with all our education and learning, allow such ideas to infiltrate the minds of our poor, unsuspecting youth. Are we not their elders and betters? Do we not owe it to them to give them the best of our civilization and keep from them the unhealthy bits, do we not owe them the benefit of our collective wisdom? It is our duty to the poor, unsuspecting youth to protect them from things that are detrimental to their growth and to lead them on to more fruitful pastures. The poor, unsuspecting youth are obviously incapable of making up their own little minds on the subject. Therefore, it is my honest opinion that such pieces of garbage ought to be deleted from university syllabuses on account of their being insulting and malicious in nature.
    Last edited by Shanna; 05-25-2006 at 02:08 PM.

  10. #10
    Now I'm sure you're playing devil's advocate here, but I would still like to add my opinion. You seem all too willing to take the easy way out in dealing with literature that does not adhere to your own 21st century moralistic sense of great art. I say this is the easy way out because it would be a much more trying undertaking if literature such as this was taught under the guiding influence of instructors who are willing to address these issues. (may sound rather idealistic, but, eh, what the hell) I believe Toni Morrison has written about her belief that all literature, even that which is blatantly racist, should be taught in the classroom. The benefit of this approach is that it brings into the light of public scrutiny such beliefs that are malignant cancers in need of detection and eradication.

    So whether or not Donne is sexist, as these singular excerpts suggest, is not important to if Donne should be taught, but rather how he should be taught.

    Anyway, I'm not familiar enough with Donne to say my opinion on the original question, but if I were I would be glad to share it.

  11. #11
    I quite agree with Shanna, such blatantly one-sided, sexist, repugnant and above all, accurate insights into the female psyche should be purged from all public bookshelves immediately and replaced with uplifting books about survivors of domestic abuse and Jade Goody's and Ulrika Johnsson's "auto"biographies - so that we can get an insight into how nice women really are (sic.).

  12. #12
    Quote Originally Posted by Xamonas Chegwe
    and above all, accurate insights into the female psyche ..
    (Gasp!)

    Et tu, Xamonas?

  13. #13
    in angulo cum libro Petrarch's Love's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    California
    Posts
    2,333
    Blog Entries
    24
    Oh, I definately agree with Shanna, but I say why stop with Donne? Why not throw out all the Renaissance poets. I mean Milton wasn't exactly a feminist, and Spenser and Shakespeare, and Sidney are all highly un-PC. Come to think of it, why not ban all works before the twenty-first century. I'm sure our own enlightened age is completely purged of any and all objectionable beliefs. Future ages will hail us for our complete and perfect Utopian wisdom. This way there would be absolutely no need for students to think about or question the texts presented to them. No more having to worry about all those knotty historical questions that hurt the brain. Not to metion, just think of the number of pesky academics you could get rid of that way. It wouldn't take more than a single part-time instructor to teach nothing but the most rigorously screened and acceptable literature of the past six years.

    "In rime sparse il suono/ di quei sospiri ond' io nudriva 'l core/ in sul mio primo giovenile errore"~ Francesco Petrarca
    "Follies and nonsense, whims and inconsistencies do divert me, I own, and I laugh at them whenever I can."~ Jane Austen

  14. #14
    in angulo cum libro Petrarch's Love's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    California
    Posts
    2,333
    Blog Entries
    24
    and above all, accurate insights into the female psyche

    "In rime sparse il suono/ di quei sospiri ond' io nudriva 'l core/ in sul mio primo giovenile errore"~ Francesco Petrarca
    "Follies and nonsense, whims and inconsistencies do divert me, I own, and I laugh at them whenever I can."~ Jane Austen

  15. #15
    Are you all telling me that Donne wasn't a curate?

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. I need to know!
    By kels21 in forum Who Said That?
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 11-06-2006, 06:46 PM
  2. A synopsis of Shakespeare's King John
    By King John Antih in forum King John
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 07-20-2005, 12:48 PM
  3. Poetry by John Clare
    By zheng89120 in forum Book & Author Requests
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-17-2005, 05:16 PM
  4. National Poetry Month
    By Basil in forum Poems, Poets, and Poetry
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-29-2005, 03:09 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •