Pay attention and take notes because there will be a quiz later on. The subject is unrealistic romantic expectations.
Women want a hunk with boyish charm who will make their girlfriends GWE (green with envy), the politically correct sensitive man of their dreams. In the words of a TV commercial he must have bad boy looks without bad boy behavior. He must be strong and decisive, yet amenable to reform -- the essence of an oxymoron or some type of moron.
Men are looking for an indulgent mother, female pal and passionate lover all rolled into one woman -- an angel with the body of a Playboy centerfold to make his friends GWE. This mercurial creature must never change from the woman he fell in love with on day one. If she so much as smiles once at another man, she is disqualified as a slut.
The biggest losers of all are men and women who settle for temporary relationships so they will seem "normal" and not losers. This is a holding action until something better comes along. The holder never realizes that if something better was actually available to them, they would have found him/her in the first place.
On the other hand, a realistic couple accepts each other warts and all. The woman resigns herself to the fact that she's dealing with a male animal who is much more interested in doing the nasty than talking about his feelings. The man accepts the fact that his mate is an ever-changing and slightly neurotic creature who needs backup. He gets nookie, she gets emotional support. They grow old and fat together and at times live happily ever after -- the best outcome sane people should expect.
Note: Please don't be pedantic and point out I am generalizing and/or oversimplifying. Of course I am. Did you think this was going to be a PhD thesis? Just exempt yourself if my remarks don't pertain to you (as I'm sure most of you will.)