Search:

Type: Posts; User: Kjetil; Keyword(s):

Search: Search took 0.00 seconds.

  1. Replies
    293
    Views
    53,854

    Oh well, that's your third consecutive post in...

    Oh well, that's your third consecutive post in which you evidently choose to simply decide for yourself what your interlocutor is talking about, with no inconvenient regard for semantics. Meanwhile,...
  2. Replies
    293
    Views
    53,854

    Well, thank you for reinforcing my accusation of...

    Well, thank you for reinforcing my accusation of sophistry. You will notice that I did not in fact characterise your position in the terms you are arguing against here, so it is again a case of...
  3. Replies
    293
    Views
    53,854

    Glad to hear it, I thought that was a bit harsh....

    Glad to hear it, I thought that was a bit harsh. :) Anyway, no offense takn.
  4. Replies
    293
    Views
    53,854

    1. The point is that less objectivity means...

    1. The point is that less objectivity means greater scope for snobbery. It is not in question which field is more objective, obviously science is.
    2. I am not a scientist. My degree is wholly in...
  5. Replies
    293
    Views
    53,854

    If you have an argument, make it. You were...

    If you have an argument, make it. You were presented with a perfectly rational objection to your post, and have no reason to sulk.
  6. Replies
    293
    Views
    53,854

    Oh, please. The "life" and "world" of a bus...

    Oh, please. The "life" and "world" of a bus driver is neither more or less real than an academic's.

    This discussion is badly in need of some agreed and stringent definition of "snobbery". People...
  7. Replies
    293
    Views
    53,854

    However that may be, the point remains that it...

    However that may be, the point remains that it obviously has much less objectivity than science.
  8. Replies
    293
    Views
    53,854

    Sorry, but that is a fairly sophistic twist by...

    Sorry, but that is a fairly sophistic twist by reductio ad absurdum on a perfectly reasonable and valid point, namely that science is by and large an activity judged on the basis of objective and...
  9. Replies
    293
    Views
    53,854

    Sorry, but he is right, and you don't seem to get...

    Sorry, but he is right, and you don't seem to get the point. Science is empirical, and relies on demonstrable proof. Art is not, and relies for its value judgment ultimately on taste. For obvious...
  10. Replies
    293
    Views
    53,854

    Now you are being deliberately obtuse. That...

    Now you are being deliberately obtuse. That question requires no answer to anyone willing to look reasonably at the statements involved.
  11. Replies
    293
    Views
    53,854

    And I rest mine on the strength of the same....

    And I rest mine on the strength of the same. Well, I'll agree to WSS as an exception, but I would rather go to the dentist than sit through Les Miserables. I stand by my characterisation of musicals...
  12. Replies
    8
    Views
    2,277

    I agree, there seems little interest in even...

    I agree, there seems little interest in even well-etablished contemporaries like John Banville or Edward St Aubyn. Is there nowhere on the net where actual live literary anglophone culture gets...
  13. Replies
    293
    Views
    53,854

    Snobbery in academia?! Surely not - whoever has...

    Snobbery in academia?! Surely not - whoever has heard of such a thing?

    Anyway, dismissing a musical because it's a musical isn't snobbery, it's just good sense. It is a vile and despicable genre.
  14. Replies
    181
    Views
    53,462

    Well, the English are in good company. What's the...

    Well, the English are in good company. What's the great French novel, in the above sense? Or German? Italian? Spanish? There isn't one. The notion seems peculiarly american, and even there, there is...
  15. Replies
    22
    Views
    18,039

    Evelyn Waugh and Saki were both fairly ruthless,...

    Evelyn Waugh and Saki were both fairly ruthless, as well as enormously funny.
  16. Replies
    83
    Views
    16,740

    Writing today and good enough for the canon?...

    Writing today and good enough for the canon? Javier Marias. Thomas Transtrømer. John Banville.
  17. Replies
    56
    Views
    8,905

    Just that it is hugely debatable if Pynchon and...

    Just that it is hugely debatable if Pynchon and DeLillo are the two best novelists working today.

    Even if they're great, You must be incredibly well read to be in a position to make that...
  18. I've read The Corrections and Freedom, as well as...

    I've read The Corrections and Freedom, as well as his essays. Like you, I come to them from a background of not having read widely in contemporary literature, but mainly rather in that of the first...
  19. Replies
    111
    Views
    102,533

    Finnegans Wake, without doubt. I also found...

    Finnegans Wake, without doubt. I also found Aristotle's Metaphysics heavy going.
Results 1 to 19 of 20