Commented "the third wave socialism" to be allowed to rest
Commented "the third wave socialism" to be allowed to rest (the spot to count: 430)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Author: Yewei http://www.pen123.net.cn 2003-3-31 10:24:56 gentleman cypress consultation network
Commented "the third wave socialism" to be allowed to rest
I to "third wave socialism" the long and short of the story are not really clear, did not know who is its lead goat, in this 1. on I has no intention to gives own ignorantly performs to conceal. Read until recently me on March 8 ctk3 several to paste at the Beijing University forum article, really felt its bored and was fabricated, in order to did not treat unjustly the good person, I especially oppressed record I impression - - was I tread several feet in its article viewpoint.
What (1) they ' the socialism ' is the definition?
I look over know the original article, saw he is like this to ' him ' ' the socialism ' gives the definition: I believed that, the so-called socialism essence may decide as, "establishment in public ownership system foundation happy society." (Picks its net article: The socialism origin, the development and the result), I unable to restrain to smile, such socialism we early already the body in among, Mr. He Laochih original again was an our generation, racks one's brains, careworn takes the trouble?
A socialism definition or said it "the essence" sees clearly with a human society, traces does not permit "happily" the adjective to summarize, really some slippery worlds greatly check, Marx conceives the socialism is unhappy? Mao Zedong establishes the socialism is unhappy? Not all is the establishment in the public ownership system? Moreover if only discusses the society whether happy, the present person as if only thought the western society is more beautiful many, then knows original gentleman already the strong only ancient (Marx) the theory, also cannot surmount (overseas) to the reality the level, by what uses? Even if pastes the label is again good, also only is talks idly to mess things up, and what is more to injure the country.
What (2) they ' the socialism ' is the content?
We have a look to know the original gentleman's another article concluding remark: ' The third wave socialism on the one hand should unifies the system construction socialism and the historical proof socialism, on the other hand is must abandon in the socialism the egalitarianism ingredient, develops the socialism and establishes the socialism which into the ability rules a nation. If the socialism has completed these two big tasks, then the socialism inevitably in the near future will be able to realize!' - - This section of writing both let me feel the body in the socialism, and feels the body outside the socialism, therefore I did not know at a loss in where! Whether do I guess like this ??: Because we now even if do not have ' to abandon in the socialism the egalitarianism ingredient ', also has not realized ' the ability to rule a nation ', but also is ' the socialism ', therefore, we easely stand in the socialism; Also because we now do not have ' to abandon in the socialism the egalitarianism ingredient ', also has not realized ' the ability to rule a nation ', therefore we can not but stand outside the socialism - - because they ' the socialism (only will be) inevitably in the near future can realize '!
I have no alternative but inexplicable to be amazed for this! Looked like ' old is gruff ' the network logic knowledge should give certain people has made up, whether he was willing to make up this is his young matter, because this was insufficient to affect me to its understanding level: Their socialism content is ' abandons the socialism the egalitarianism, the realization ' the ability rules a nation ' or ' the system construction ' for heart thought.
So mentions below, I have the question: First, our country at present is the social system take the public ownership system as the foundation socialist system? Second, our country at present "more pay for more work" distribution system whether still was (they) ' the socialism ' egalitarianism? And by far has not implemented them ' the socialism ' more pay for more work? Third, whether may say our country at present the government official, the head of undertaking and these capitalists all do not have the ability - - at least are do not have these our country not in the leadership post, not when boss's person has the ability! Otherwise, if they (government official, head of undertaking) has the ability, is outstanding, then our country is rules a nation in the implementation ability! Why bother lets know original gentleman to discuss again the ability rules a nation? If they really have not ruled a nation the ability, I did not know what will know original gentleman "to rule a nation the ability" to refer to taste?
First and the second question I originally did not want to do answered - - because our country blotted out the sky the propaganda article has already solved these two problems in several years ago. But knows the original gentleman's public ownership system really some "the communist altogether wife" everybody if does not believe please looked "if looks at the public ownership system from this kind of angle, we discovered socialist countries and so on former Soviet Union and China have not certainly realized in the true significance public ownership system. Because, these countries all have the property right of inheritance. But only has realized the producer goods state-owned system "this section of speech, a person has created the wealth, cannot remain for the children, cannot give the person which oneself wants to grant, I did not know how he will realize such dream, the humanity pursues own development the power will be what? If continually these most minimum general knowledge did not know, whether compares (him to think Marx is fantasy) Marx ' the fantasy ' also Marx?
Actually, who doesn't take into consideration realistically writes article to be able, do the vast ????how many thousand words, need to wait for the society for me which lives to open the salvation effective prescription, after if the effective prescription opens, but is some person of blood steamed bun and so on gadget, not only does not treat an illness, is actually difficult to look very much, did not know is its medical skill is limited, or I wait to be terminally ill, only can give the comforts formula and so on, after can barely manage to maintain a feeble existence but already?
If we thoroughly thought again, we are not difficult to discover, so-called "the blood relationship rules a nation" although from Xia Ch'ishih, but each generation of emperor is old also all wants bequeaths own landscape most has ' the ability ' the son, good lets the landscape pass on from generation to generation; Similarly, each family, also is not willing own property rights to give the black sheep of the family, how our country successive dynasties all previous dynasties still was the country not the country, the family rich only five generations? Moreover our country five generation of countries galloping-horse lanterns trade emperor - - the example which whether is knows which original gentleman to esteem the ability rules a nation? If these questions, merely sums up for is because ' the blood relationship rules a nation ' and ' the ability rules a nation ' the different consequence, high deliberately mispresents with Zhao, or confuses one for the other differently what? I believed that, their intention only is wants to mislead the public, covers our country social fact truth!
What is the our country society realistic truth? The our country society realistic truth is does not acknowledge "individual private power" the existence! Regardless of is feudal society's king military and political leaders, or present socialism society, all over the world, is it possible that king earth, but Wang Hsingk'o changes, Wang Ch'uankuei who? In our country history is because may result in, who doesn't want to kill and torch? Because seizes by force may become, who doesn't want to change from one dynasty to another? If we look at the history, merely saw politics Pure Brightness the time, individual private power is how consolidated, but the blind political power chaotic date, the land, how the wealth are evolves, for reads person of in vain the history! The people, we actually all want to attain without effort, therefore did not acknowledge individual private power - - this is takes root in our country nationality's most despicable cultural courage and uprightness, has a look, from the king to the common people common people, how many people has to acknowledge the other people ' individual private power ' but not to think "gains the small advantage"? - - For example, confiscates family's property to exterminate the clan, to work for one's own interests under the guise of working for the public, pretends, the false diploma, the vacation spuriously... ... Even our present, because own do not have the thought, the theory, actually takes (gains) the overseas ready-made thought, the theory dodges the people - - also no matter suits our country national condition; In develops in our country economy national policy: purchases the munitions, introduces the production line... ... Such matter not all is the people in from the innermost feelings thought "gains" the western nation "to be cheap"! What a pity very much, excessively relies on is equal to the attachment, "is cheap" has not gained how many, but actually the national total output value must rely on "100 hundred million pair of pants to trade a Boeing" the type exportation to support! Simultaneously the country also did not have ' the Yalu River ' again, ' the Zhenbao Island ' anger!
