View RSS Feed

Imported Poems

Out of Time

Rate this Entry
One of my silent presumptions concerning gifted prose/poetry is that behind the word curtain an unspoken rhythm pulses forth, carrying each syllable along like a flowing river. Not surprisingly, I discovered this unrecognized belief while working on a poem. A certain phrase struck me as odd, and as I labored over it, trying to find the right combination of words to please my ear. When finally I arrived at some semblance of acceptability, I sat back and asked myself "Why" the first combination of words weren't sufficient. I then discovered that the piece - a poem I had written - had a particular cadence to it, and as I read it aloud I patted my leg to test the theory. Though some words occured in "the spaces in between", it kept a steady rhythm, and I realized that I had always been hearing this music - whether in my earlier days when my poetry most resembled the Beat Poets - or currently when I most approximate those "days of yore" we call classical/lyrical poetry.

Consequently I understood my reason for despising Modernism: it doesn't sing. It doesn't play the piano. It doesn't dance. And for these absences, every modern bit of prose/poetry to me is like a factured mirror of cognitive chaotic dissonance, like a 3 year old child with a drum and two sticks, banging away in complete ignorance.

I am not saying Modernism has no redeemable quality, but rather, like Southern Fiction, it does not appeal to me. If I can't dance or sing to it, it more or less disrupts my mental rhythm. (Granted, not everything singable or danceable is good; one can dance to Brittany Spears or Justin Timberlake, yet it is talentless inferior bubble-gum music. In some ways, then, Modernism trumps the kitsch that oftentimes appears under this description).

Now, today, while perusing British Literature (for my teacher's examination) I stumbled upon this bit of wisdom in Wikipedia:

Alliteration gained considerable popularity during the Romantic era, as the Romantics were interested in writing poetry with a musical quality, and in the ancient tradition of their native languages.
Here is yet another quality that places me squarely in with the Romantics, a bygone era of beauty and artistic brilliance. If the Buddhists are right, then I am merely a reborn, throw-forward poettaster from that blissful period.

And I wonder why I live here at all, when it's clear my time is not now, nor later, but before, back then, previously. Truth is, my time has already passed, and I am merely living out post-mortem days of cultural incongruence.

Submit "Out of Time" to Digg Submit "Out of Time" to del.icio.us Submit "Out of Time" to StumbleUpon Submit "Out of Time" to Google

Categories

Comments

  1. andave_ya's Avatar
    And I wonder why I live here at all, when it's clear my time is not now, nor later, but before, back then, previously. Truth is, my time has already passed, and I am merely living out post-mortem days of cultural incongruence.
    My family always teases me, lovingly of course, and call me Grandma, old soul, bookworm and say that I should have lived in the thirties

    What you said about the poetry having a rhythm is true, but I've learned that once you understand modernist stuff it has a beauty of its own. I didn't like abstract art until I took an art class and learned to dissect it. Now, I can even start vaguely to understand Jackson Pollock.