Institutionalized Ignorance
by
, 01-14-2019 at 05:13 PM (2790 Views)
A few days ago I was horrified to read the James Watson, Nobel Laureate for having discovered DNA, is being condemned for having made comments that are alleged to be racist; although there has been no inquiry into the veracity of his comments.
Specifically, Doctor Watson is cited as having said, “There’s a “difference on the average between blacks and whites on IQ tests,” he said. “I would say the difference is ... genetic.” He also said he took no joy in his conclusion. The situation is “awful,” he said, “just like it’s awful for schizophrenics.” He added: “I like black people.”
While in the broad sense of racism being a belief that there are multiple races of humans, Watson’s opinion is demonstrated in many published study of IQ’s by country. This article lists and maps average IQ by country, and it is clear that Sub-Saharan Africa has lower average IQ’s than other regions. https://brainstats.com/average-iq-by-country.html This has been known for decades, and some attempts have been made to explain the difference, but without much success. Watson is not the only one who believes that there is a genetic component to the gap between IQ’s of people of different skin colors or ethnic background. The udel.edu article mentions a persistent 15-point difference between Blacks and Whites in the U.S.A. that cannot be explained by cultural factors. https://www1.udel.edu/educ/gottfreds...sen30years.pdf
It is clear that Watson in regard to a matter that appears to be well within his realm of study. I have not seen anything that suggested that he has never inquired into the matter of whether IQ has a genetic component. If Watson had simply shot from the hip, then there might be reason to criticize him. It appears that the institution where he has been teaching, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory on Long Island, grossly over-reacted to his comments by stripping him of his academic titles.
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry...b0922a21d630c9
As someone who respects science, I am offended by the actions of Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory on Long Island, especially since no one seems to have shown that Watson's comments were erroneous. If they, or others, want to prove that there is no genetic component in intelligence, then they should do that. I expect that Watson has an excellent idea of how genetic characteristics are inherited, and I think that Watson deserves apologies and compensation.
In the past I have written about falsified laboratory results, and It just occurred to me that the two issues may be related. Maybe some scientists falsified results so they can produce papers that concur with the desires of their institutions. That would be even sadder than that there are falsified lab results at all. Has it become impossible to state positions on academic questions that are other than what the institutions like. That would smack of pre-Enlightenment thought, when the Church had to approve everything before it could be printed.
If someone else in the field of genetics, psychometrics, or whatever had argued that Watson was mistaken, it would be a different matter, but it appears that the facts back up Watson. There may be a lot more to the matter, but Watson clearly has demonstrable facts behind him.