View RSS Feed

Memories of the 28th Century

Marketing Hype

Rating: 4 votes, 5.00 average.
It is amazing how gullible humans are. This morning I noticed a guy rolling cigarettes with filters, and I almost laughed. That guy can almost be forgiven, because he was only about thirty years old, but filter cigarettes weren't popular until the 1950's, when they were hyped as safer. While most of the filters do remove some tars, they don't remove enough to actually make cigarettes safer, and there were some filters that were made of asbestos, which causes asbestosis and cancer. The marketing hype became so ingrained that people still smoke filter cigarettes, because they think they are safer.

But that's only one of the great many examples of people buying the sizzle instead of the steak. Consider Apple Computer. That company should have been liquidated decades ago, but they started selling hype, and the inferior and overpriced equipment that Apple produced started selling even more. Read this article "5 Marketing Tools Apple Exploits To Build The Hype" http://www.fastcompany.com/3001650/5...its-build-hype . I especially like "They create a passionate brand community of fans who identity with Apple's brand values." And what does it tell you about people if they are passionate about a culture of hype? But it was clear back in the 1980's that Apple was to be avoided, because they concentrated on proprietary hardware and software, while the Wintel computer architecture was open to all. As a result Wintel computers were faster, cheaper, and generally more convenient. In the mid-1990's Apple heated up their hype, and they are still in business, and their products are still overpriced and lower quality. I wish I'd bought the stock, but I am glad that I never wasted money on their products.

But I favor equal opportunities. That Microsoft was a heroic opponent of Big Blue in the 1980’s didn’t prevent it from becoming the Evil Empire after it eclipsed Big Blue. The relative simplicity and ease of use that typified early versions of Windows became history after Microsoft became the 800 pound gorilla, but no one mentioned to the people who ran Microsoft, so they didn’t realize that their bloated software wasn’t very good. If you were to look for the best Windows ever, then you would download some version of Linux. If Linux goes mainstream, then some company probably will follow the path blazed by Microsoft.

Searching the internet for other examples of hype is interesting, because one person's hype is someone else's beautiful advertising copy. One interesting looking site that came up is http://createhype.com/ , which is described as "Create Hype is a community of women entrepreneurs who want to promote their business effectively with actionable marketing tips."
Then there's http://creativemms.com/interactive-m...building-hype/ "Interactive Marketing at Its Finest: Building Hype." There was something about Justin Bieber on this site, and that reminded me of people created purely by hype. It is possible that some of the people are nothing but hype. I don't know if Justin Bieber can do anything, but I have never seen any evidence that he is anything except hype, but he is far from being alone in that.

Another kind of product where the hype has been selling is electric cars. There are reasons for electric automobiles to exist, but they are much too expensive, and the weight of the machines makes them rather inefficient. Here in the U.S.A. and in some other countries the government subsidies are the only way that most people can afford them. If the subsidies were eliminated, then so would the electric cars. On a practical basis, electric cars aren't worth the money.

Then there is the hype about vaccinations. Apparently the official position is that life will be better if all children to be vaccinated against measles. Considering the level of immunity gained (quite little) and the severity of the disease (quite mild) and the mortality rate (very low) there isn't much reason for anyone to be vaccinated against measles, but the government medical types seem to think that it is a major priority. They are making measles equal with smallpox, which has a mortality rate of about 30%. This appears to be pure hype. If I were selling measles, then I'd feel rather flattered. If the pro-vaccination people were actually doing satire, then it would make more sense, but they claim to be serious and then continue to hype measles as a major disease and vaccination as a major issue.

Then there were and continue to be weather forecasts. There was a storm a few weeks ago that was hyped as the storm of the century; it was supposed to drop between two and three feet of snow. It left about a foot, enough to be an inconvenience, but it shouldn't have required shutting everything down. Meteorologists make over hyping weather a standard activity. Looking at it from their point of view it is understandable, but there are people who don't understand that it is just hype, and that cutting it back by fifty percent before taking action is a very good idea. This is another of the flavors of hype that people should have learned about sometime ago.

And I just thought of the biggest collection of hype that has come down the pike ever, the marketing of the medical industry. The medical industry has changed dramatically in the last few decades. The practice of medicine used to be about curing and preventing preventable or curable disease, but it has recently been converted to "healthcare", and it seems to want to require everyone to use a collection of treatments and medicines that will maximize the profits of the medical insurance companies, hospital chains, and major drug manufacturers. The more I think about it the worse it looks. Remember how Cholesterol was demonized for a few decades, but recently cholesterol was restored to its position as something that is necessary for animal life? There are more such mistaken condemnations that will be reversed.

Try to keep a healthy skepticism about everything.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamestay...nother-record/

Comments

  1. Iain Sparrow's Avatar
    You are quite wrong concerning Apple Computers, and what effect they had on personal computers in those early years... I was there, working as I do now in the publishing/printing industry, and what Apple did and what you conveniently missed is make computers accessible to people who knew little to nothing about computers... and make a living with them. Almost overnight average folks could greatly reduce the cost of content creation by producing print-ready documents using fairly inexpensive and approachable applications (QuarkX, Adobe Photoshop, Adobe Illustrator, etc.). By and large, they used Apple Computers, for many it was their first time using a personal computer.
    Are you old enough to recall what the Windows OS was like way back in the early and mid 1990s? Oh my god, what an unholy mess!

    I currently use both platforms at work, and let me tell you... Windows is still an unholy mess, and the Apple OS and hardware... bulletproof.
  2. PeterL's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by Iain Sparrow
    You are quite wrong concerning Apple Computers, and what effect they had on personal computers in those early years... I was there, working as I do now in the publishing/printing industry, and what Apple did and what you conveniently missed is make computers accessible to people who knew little to nothing about computers... and make a living with them. Almost overnight average folks could greatly reduce the cost of content creation by producing print-ready documents using fairly inexpensive and approachable applications (QuarkX, Adobe Photoshop, Adobe Illustrator, etc.). By and large, they used Apple Computers, for many it was their first time using a personal computer.
    Are you old enough to recall what the Windows OS was like way back in the early and mid 1990s? Oh my god, what an unholy mess!

    I currently use both platforms at work, and let me tell you... Windows is still an unholy mess, and the Apple OS and hardware... bulletproof.
    I remember those timeswell, and I knew people who praised Apple to the heavens. Apple was one of many companies that made computers "accessible to people who knew little to nothing about computers." Apple was actually kind of late to the game, but they gained a following, not because their computers were better, but because they said they were. I will admit that in the 80's Apple was as good as any micros that were available. Wintel arcchitecture was superior, but the software wasn't as convenient. These days I would say that both Wintel and Apple make amazingly poor equipment. I don't see any good reasons for anyone using anything from Apple, and Microsoft software has greatly degenerated in the past decade, after about a decade when Microsfot made some very good software.

    But opinions vary.
  3. robert-wr's Avatar
    so good
  4. Clopin's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by Iain Sparrow
    You are quite wrong concerning Apple Computers, and what effect they had on personal computers in those early years... I was there, working as I do now in the publishing/printing industry, and what Apple did and what you conveniently missed is make computers accessible to people who knew little to nothing about computers... and make a living with them. Almost overnight average folks could greatly reduce the cost of content creation by producing print-ready documents using fairly inexpensive and approachable applications (QuarkX, Adobe Photoshop, Adobe Illustrator, etc.). By and large, they used Apple Computers, for many it was their first time using a personal computer.
    Are you old enough to recall what the Windows OS was like way back in the early and mid 1990s? Oh my god, what an unholy mess!

    I currently use both platforms at work, and let me tell you... Windows is still an unholy mess, and the Apple OS and hardware... bulletproof.
    Ironic that you're parroting the "it just works" Apple marketing spiel verbatim in the comment section of a blogpost lamenting the gullibility of your average consumer. Enjoy your $3000 computer pal.
  5. PeterL's Avatar
    It is effective marketing hype that Apple has been using for decades now, but it is just hype. I wish I had done that well.
  6. Clopin's Avatar
    And of course your average socially minded young liberal has no problem paying fifty times the manufacturing cost of their iPhones or MacBooks while conditions in the factories are so bad that workers in China are literally killing themselves. Amazing that you can get people to buy an underperforming, immensely overpriced (apple computers are easily being sold for 3x what a 'pc' with identical hardware goes for ), limited (the software and apple app store are INCREDIBLY limited in comparison to other platforms), product, which doesn't even manage to be socially conscious or commendable. I mean if you're exploiting virtual slave labour for your disposable piece of trash phones you should really expect to get them for cheap right?
    Updated 03-10-2015 at 03:29 PM by Clopin
  7. PeterL's Avatar
    But don't you wish that you could hype sopmething so effectively?

    I have no use for the hardware and software, but I would love to collect money the way that Apple does. The markup on the computers is nothing compared to what they do with iPhones. I just looked that up, and they are charging $395 for 5S; I gasped. That has to be at least seven or eight times the total cost to Apple. You can buy a fairly good laptop for that price and toss in a headset for your phone using Skype.