Ok. I was fully aware of the “risk”. I knew in advance that my text Naïve II wouldn’t be meeting the most recent dogmas of modern poetry. In another fine anglo forum they said “completely outdated yet it’s a good lyrical”. And they found every stance perfectly readable I mean no “garbling” problem . One thing is sure: each one has the right to have his/her own ideas based on the seriousness of his /her research, but no one has the right to say “behold the final rules of modern poetry”…! Last but not the least I made the mistake of posting it on purpose. As in fighting sports sparring: no mistakes – no wisdom… And now ladies & gentlemans back to the ring…! ;-)
