View RSS Feed

Halls of the Dark Muse

Further Proof that as a Woman I am a Mutant

Rate this Entry
I have mentioned in a previous post that I have recently started reading a couple of books of which I am now finding a bit difficult or at the least somewhat disappointing considering what my expectations for the book were.

One of the books mentioned is a book called Outlander, which caught my interest initially because of my great love of historical fiction, and most particularly of all things Celtic, the story is set primarily in 18th century Scotland.

Well the book is geared towards a female audience and most people (primarily all women) who have read the book rave about how much they love it.

Now one of the biggest problems I have with the book is the fact that the narrator of the story who is the stories main heroine (and presumably suppose to be someone likeable and sympathetic) is as far as I am concerned an adulteress and it seems to be I am the only person (who has read/reading the book) that finds this the least bit morally questionable and is at all bothered by the fact.

The primary premises of the book revolves around this woman who travels back into time, and in the 20th century she is married, and then of course she ends up hooking up with some dude in the 18th century.

I suppose some people can use the time travel aspect as justification of her infidelity, but because she is fully conscious of her actions, and knows what she is doing, and when she is in the past fully remembers her life in Modern day and her husband, I really don't find that as a viable or acceptable excuse.

I am just a bit surprised that so many women are so willing to rally around such a hussy of a female protagonist, though it seems also that the majority of women who read the books also develop a crush upon the heroine's lover.

Then perhaps I am just too steadfast upon my views against infidelity, while most women I suppose see the book as some sort of romantic escapist fantasy about dashing through the highlands with some Scottish hunk, I just wish that someone would shove the narrator off the cliff.

Perhaps the other problem is that being that I never have got along well with women in actuality, it should not be surprising I am equally incapable of getting along with a woman narrator in a story. In addition to her being an adulteress, I find her overall personality grating upon my nerves.

Updated 06-06-2010 at 05:10 PM by Dark Muse

Categories
Books

Comments

  1. L.M. The Third's Avatar
    Women are cats. Cats hiss at other cats. Is that simple enough?
  2. Dark Muse's Avatar
    I am really more of a crcodile!
  3. qimissung's Avatar
    I have never read outlander. Like you, I find the idea appealing, the reality less so. I think the other lover thing is supposed to be escapist in nature, but I can never suspend my disbelief enough to enjoy it. Meow. Enough said. After while, crocodile.
  4. Dark Muse's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by qimissung
    I have never read outlander. Like you, I find the idea appealing, the reality less so. I think the other lover thing is supposed to be escapist in nature, but I can never suspend my disbelief enough to enjoy it. Meow. Enough said. After while, crocodile.
    Yes that is the problem I have, there is the part of my brain that tells myself I should not take it literally that it is meant to just be an escapist fantasy, and then there is the other part of my brain (which usually wins) that just thinks the narrator is a cheating whore and does not understand why anyone would find that the least bit appealing, attractive, or sympathetic.

    But I suppose that because it is done in the first person other women are supposed to live out the fantasy vicariously through her, but I am incapable of doing that and well to be honest I thus far seem to remain immune to the charms of the male protagonist. I don't dislike him, but I don't find myself developing any sort of crush on him either.

    Though I don't think the authors character development is all that great.