View Full Version : this book was dull

04-16-2003, 01:00 AM
Hey Phil,<br>Maybe if you would try to read the book for something more than just "a guy go's through time" you would realize that this book applies to life. Now i know you can't help the fact that you might not be able to read deeper into things, but this book has real substance. So, next time try to look past the surface of what a story's subject might appear to be.

04-16-2003, 01:00 AM
more than one point of view? So, like, the Babysitters Club?

06-11-2003, 01:00 AM
Ha! Babysitters Club! It's Funny!

06-27-2003, 01:00 AM
I think you have a different style in taste in books than some people. For me, I only like one person telling the story. You don't get confused on who is telling what. Thats why I like stories that can be very well explaned

07-27-2003, 01:00 AM
I'm with u the book was a little bland

02-21-2004, 02:00 AM
It'd actually a double narrative

01-21-2005, 04:53 PM
I fell asleep... don't get me wrong... I like some books but geez... it was the 1800's when he wrote it! ZzzZZzzz

02-05-2005, 09:06 PM
I agree that the novel is a fine example of Wells story telling ability and I loved it. However, it is explained not explaned

05-24-2005, 06:07 PM
I did not find this book very enjoying. I don't really care for the books with only one person telling the story. I need more than one point of view. So to me this book could have had a little more spice, big whope a guy goes through time.