Daoloth
05-07-2006, 03:22 PM
Brutus and Marcus Antonius both give a eulogy over Julius in Act III, scene 2, but Brutus' is much shorter than Marcus Antonius'. Also Marcus Antonius wasn't quite honest about his intentions in giving his eulogy (to 'secretly' scandalize Brutus and the other conspirators).
At Shakespeare's time, rhetoric was falling from the position it had held in ancient times, it wasn't quite reduced to "window dressing" and "pure cosmetics" that the Enlightenment called it.
Yet, Marcus Antonius was clearly the better (in the sense of "more skilled") rhetorician of Brutus and he. Did Shakespeare make it so purposefully, using the dubious quality that was being attributed to Rhetorics, as a marker that Marcus Antonius was less honourable than Brutus?
At Shakespeare's time, rhetoric was falling from the position it had held in ancient times, it wasn't quite reduced to "window dressing" and "pure cosmetics" that the Enlightenment called it.
Yet, Marcus Antonius was clearly the better (in the sense of "more skilled") rhetorician of Brutus and he. Did Shakespeare make it so purposefully, using the dubious quality that was being attributed to Rhetorics, as a marker that Marcus Antonius was less honourable than Brutus?